Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Select the points for the requirements for returns page #833

Merged
merged 56 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

rvsiyad
Copy link
Contributor

@rvsiyad rvsiyad commented Mar 18, 2024

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4295

This is PR is focused on adding functionality to page 2 of 11 in the return requirement pages.

The pages were previously setup as part of a separate PR to create the user journey.

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4295

This is PR is focused on adding functionality to page 2 of 11 in the return requirement pages.

The pages were previously setup as part of a separate PR to create the user journey.
@rvsiyad rvsiyad added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 18, 2024
@rvsiyad rvsiyad self-assigned this Mar 18, 2024
rvsiyad added 27 commits March 18, 2024 10:43
@rvsiyad rvsiyad requested a review from Beckyrose200 March 21, 2024 11:02
@rvsiyad rvsiyad marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2024 11:02
Copy link
Member

@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome work! If we've been doing our job properly the whole Get-view-Submit-Validate pattern in our code should start to become clear and you can see how other pages are doing the same thing.

A few things to clear up, and don't be concerned about pinging me if all I've done is confuse things or more likely, got it completely wrong!

app/controllers/return-requirements.controller.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/presenters/return-requirements/points.presenter.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/presenters/return-requirements/points.presenter.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/presenters/return-requirements/points.presenter.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/views/return-requirements/points.njk Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
app/views/return-requirements/points.njk Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rvsiyad rvsiyad requested a review from Cruikshanks March 22, 2024 14:55
Copy link
Member

@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some really minor nit-picks left!

@rvsiyad rvsiyad requested a review from Cruikshanks March 25, 2024 10:32
Copy link
Member

@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rvsiyad rvsiyad merged commit 2b2dafb into main Mar 25, 2024
6 checks passed
@rvsiyad rvsiyad deleted the return-requirements-select-points branch March 25, 2024 16:13
rvsiyad added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
…points page

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4295

#833

This was a ticket that was thought to have been completed, but upon QA testing by Ven, some licences seem to have
duplicated 'abstraction points'. There was a previous check within the code preventing this but it was removed as no
duplicating 'point_details' were encountered at that time.

This PR will be focused on preventing duplicating abstraction points being present within the list of checkbox points on
the return requirements points page.
rvsiyad added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
…#861)

* Fix issue with duplicated abstraction points for return requirements points page

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4295

#833

This was a ticket that was thought to have been completed, but upon QA testing by Ven, some licences seem to have
duplicated 'abstraction points'. There was a previous check within the code preventing this but it was removed as no
duplicating 'point_details' were encountered at that time.

This PR will be focused on preventing duplicating abstraction points being present within the list of checkbox points on
the return requirements points page.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants