Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create idm schema models and helpers #563

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Cruikshanks
Copy link
Member

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4057

As part of the work we have been doing on two-part tariff we are going to be creating all our new tables in the default public schema.

We have also decided that when there is a legacy table that we are still going to need we will create a View of it in the public schema. This allows us to correct any issues with naming conventions, strip out unused fields, and join entities that are currently sat in different schemas. The first example of this approach was done in PR #531 .

This change adds the models and helpers for the views in the idm schema that were created in PR #555

The final step will then be to refactor the existing code to use the new models and delete the old legacy ones.

https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4057

As part of the work we have been doing on two-part tariff we are going to be creating all our new tables in the default `public` schema.

We have also decided that when there is a legacy table that we are still going to need we will create a [View](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createview.html) of it in the `public` schema. This allows us to correct any issues with naming conventions, strip out unused fields, and join entities that are currently sat in different schemas. The first example of this approach was done in PR #531 .

This change adds the models and helpers for the views in the `idm` schema that were created in PR #555

> The final step will then be to refactor the existing code to use the new models and delete the old legacy ones.
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks added the housekeeping Refactoring, tidying up or other work which supports the project label Dec 3, 2023
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks self-assigned this Dec 3, 2023
test/support/helpers/user-group.helper.js Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
test/support/helpers/user-role.helper.js Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
@Cruikshanks
Copy link
Member Author

SonarCloud is complaining about the duplication. But that is only to be expected until we can remove the legacy models.

@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2023 17:17
Copy link
Contributor

@Jozzey Jozzey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good, just a couple of typos

test/support/helpers/user-group.helper.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/support/helpers/user-role.helper.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks requested a review from Jozzey December 4, 2023 13:48
Jozzey
Jozzey previously approved these changes Dec 4, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Jozzey Jozzey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As discussed in the team, we think having both referenced makes it clearer where the data is coming from.
Copy link
Contributor

@Jozzey Jozzey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍🏼

@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks merged commit 00782a7 into main Dec 4, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@Cruikshanks Cruikshanks deleted the add-new-idm-models branch December 4, 2023 20:26
Cruikshanks added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2023
https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4057

As part of the work we have been doing on two-part tariff we are going to be creating all our new tables in the default `public` schema.

We have also decided that when there is a legacy table that we are still going to need we will create a [View](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createview.html) of it in the `public` schema. This allows us to correct any issues with naming conventions, strip out unused fields, and join entities that are currently sat in different schemas. The first example of this approach was done in PR #531 .

In [Create idm schema views](#555) we created the new views. Then in [Create idm schema models and helpers](#563) we added the new models and helpers that use them.

This is the final step in the process, refactoring any use of the legacy models to use the new ones, and deleted all the legacy based code.
Cruikshanks added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
https://eaflood.atlassian.net/browse/WATER-4057

As part of the work we have been doing on two-part tariff, we will be creating all our new tables in the default `public` schema.

We have also decided that when there is a legacy table that we are still going to need we will create a [View](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createview.html) of it in the `public` schema. This allows us to correct any issues with naming conventions, strip out unused fields, and join entities currently sat in different schemas. The first example of this approach was done in PR #531 .

We created the new views in [Create IDM schema views](#555). Then in [Create IDM schema models and helpers](#563) we added the new models and helpers that use them.

This is the final step in the process, we are refactoring any use of the legacy models to use the new ones and deleting all the legacy-based code.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
housekeeping Refactoring, tidying up or other work which supports the project
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants