Add support for alias to Legacy Models #423
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DEFRA/water-abstraction-team#97
We hit a snag as part of the Great Rename!
We want
water.charge_elements
to beChargeReferences
. We then wantwater.charge_purposes
to beChargeElements
. But there is a relationship between the 2 that has to be defined inChargeReferenceModel
.The problem is when you run
const query = await ChargeReferenceModel.query().innerJoinRelated('chargeElements')
you get an error from Objection.js.If we can get Objection to alias
charge_elements
ascharge_references
in our query then we would remove the error. To do this we need to usealias()
in the custom query builder used by the model. Currently, all our models extendLegacyBaseModel
which usesSchemaQueryBuilder
to ensure all legacy models apply a schema.This change refactors
SchemaQueryBuilder
to also handle applying a table alias when one exists.