Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added initial narrow integration tests #41

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

swdpcomputing
Copy link
Collaborator

@swdpcomputing swdpcomputing commented Oct 24, 2024

WIP - DO NOT MERGE

Initial thoughts for narrow integrations tests. @alanplatt @Andrew-Folga please check that the urls being checked fit with what we expect after today's work.


UPDATE - WE CAN MERGE IT NOW

@swdpcomputing swdpcomputing self-assigned this Oct 24, 2024
@Andrew-Folga Andrew-Folga force-pushed the TGC-451-narrow-integration-smoke-test branch from d77ee31 to 5773c21 Compare October 31, 2024 09:51
@Andrew-Folga
Copy link
Collaborator

This is now complete. The idea is to create server (without starting) as part of the container the tests are run in and use server.inject(...) to bypass networking etc. This PR includes both simple response tests and view tests.

@Andrew-Folga Andrew-Folga force-pushed the TGC-451-narrow-integration-smoke-test branch from f9fdee3 to 3f971bd Compare November 1, 2024 14:55
ScenarioFactory
ScenarioFactory previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Copy link
Collaborator

@Andrew-Folga Andrew-Folga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Andrew-Folga Andrew-Folga merged commit 0c5b909 into main Nov 4, 2024
11 checks passed
@Andrew-Folga Andrew-Folga deleted the TGC-451-narrow-integration-smoke-test branch November 4, 2024 13:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants