Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bau metaschema #25

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Bau metaschema #25

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

hughfdjackson
Copy link
Contributor

@hughfdjackson hughfdjackson commented Nov 21, 2024

Our application state must satisfy a number of different constraints:

QUESTION DATA

  1. It must be possible to know the exact questions & answers given
  2. As questions evolve over time, we need to know which questions are
    getting at an underlying meaning so that we can use them to integrate
    to downstream systems (e.g. case management, risk engine, data
    analytics)
  3. As multiple-selection answers evolve over time, we need to know
    what the options map to

JOURNEY DATA

  1. We need to know what application journey a user was going through (so
    we can handle their application correctly when we release a new
    version)
  2. In the long run - when we support many application journeys - we will
    need to distinguish between the journeys themselves

hughfdjackson and others added 7 commits November 21, 2024 11:37
Our application state must satisfy a number of different constraints:

**QUESTION DATA**

1. It must be possible to know the exact questions & answers given
2. As questions evolve over time, we need to know which questions are
   getting at an underlying meaning so that we can use them to integrate
   to downstream systems (e.g. case management, risk engine, data
   analytics)
3. As multiple-selection *answers* evolve over time, we need to know
   what the options map to

**JOURNEY DATA**

1. We need to know what application journey a user was going through (so
   we can handle their application correctly when we release a new
   version)
2. In the long run - when we support many application journeys - we will
   need to distinguish between the journeys themselves
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 New Major Issues (required ≤ 0)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@hughfdjackson
Copy link
Contributor Author

hughfdjackson commented Jan 13, 2025

This analysis has moved - closing this PR & deleting branch.

@hughfdjackson hughfdjackson deleted the BAU-metaschema branch January 13, 2025 11:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants