IVAR: Clarifications of the cyber-sickness result

Croydon · Apr 6, 2024 · be1538c · be1538c
1 parent 982d863
commit be1538c
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/content/2024/04/interaction-in-virtual-and-augmented-reality-project.md b/content/2024/04/interaction-in-virtual-and-augmented-reality-project.md
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ It is worth noting, that while this particular task spawn was indeed difficult,
 | **Average total** | 2.5    | 7.17     | 7
 
 
-There seems to be no major difference on average when it comes to cyber-sickness symptoms, between the locomotion system of the pre-study and the final study. P4 has a spike, but individual people have different sensitivity to cyber-sickness. That there is no major difference on average is an interesting result, since the pre-study had no tunneling vignette, while the final study had one. Thus, one could expect, that the cyber-sickness symptoms in the pre-study are more severe. On the other hand, the pre-study locomotion system was based on a continuous teleportation of the player. Teleportation is known to cause less cyber-sickness in general. The final study's locomotion system did use an acceleration system instead. Once more, more data would be required to have deeper insights.
+There seems to be no major difference on average when it comes to cyber-sickness symptoms, between the the pre-study and the final study. P4 has a spike, but individual people have different sensitivity to cyber-sickness. The fact, that there is no major difference on average is an interesting result, since the pre-study had no tunneling vignette, while the final study had one. Thus, one could expect, that the cyber-sickness symptoms in the pre-study are more severe. On the other hand, the pre-study locomotion system was based on a continuous teleportation of the player. The final study's locomotion system did use an acceleration system instead. Teleportation is known to cause less cyber-sickness in general. Once more, more data would be required to have deeper insights.
 
 The average response for the presence is almost identical (`7` in the pre-study, vs `7.25`). The average value for enjoyment has a small difference (`6.5` in the pre-study vs `7.25`), but there is too little data to make an educated guess as to why this might be.