Skip to content

Bump Dapper from 2.1.72 to 2.1.79#690

Merged
NToppingCCS merged 1 commit into
developfrom
dependabot/nuget/Ccs.Ppg.Utility.Cache/Dapper-2.1.79
May 20, 2026
Merged

Bump Dapper from 2.1.72 to 2.1.79#690
NToppingCCS merged 1 commit into
developfrom
dependabot/nuget/Ccs.Ppg.Utility.Cache/Dapper-2.1.79

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github May 17, 2026

Updated Dapper from 2.1.72 to 2.1.79.

Release notes

Sourced from Dapper's releases.

2.1.79

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: DapperLib/Dapper@2.1.72...2.1.79

Commits viewable in compare view.

@dependabot dependabot Bot added .NET Pull requests that update .NET code dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels May 17, 2026
@ccs-snyk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ccs-snyk commented May 17, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: Dapper
  dependency-version: 2.1.79
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot force-pushed the dependabot/nuget/Ccs.Ppg.Utility.Cache/Dapper-2.1.79 branch from e1881e1 to 6479617 Compare May 20, 2026 10:11
@NToppingCCS NToppingCCS merged commit ca7fcd7 into develop May 20, 2026
6 checks passed
@NToppingCCS NToppingCCS deleted the dependabot/nuget/Ccs.Ppg.Utility.Cache/Dapper-2.1.79 branch May 20, 2026 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file .NET Pull requests that update .NET code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants