Fix issue with initial project query request failing #2730
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to two frontend service files: Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
frontend/src/modules/auth/services/auth.service.ts(2 hunks)frontend/src/modules/lf/segments/lf-segments-service.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/src/modules/auth/services/auth.service.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Config import added for fallback tenant ID
The import is correctly placed and necessary for the new fallback functionality.
18-18: Verify the implications of using a fallback tenant ID
While this change prevents the initial failure, it might mask underlying initialization issues. Consider:
- Are there scenarios where we shouldn't fall back to a default tenant?
- Should we log when falling back to help debug initialization issues?
Let's check for other places that might assume tenant ID is always from localStorage:
Consider adding logging when falling back to the default tenant ID to help identify potential initialization issues:
- return localStorage.getItem('currentTenant') || config.lf.tenantId;
+ const storedTenant = localStorage.getItem('currentTenant');
+ if (!storedTenant) {
+ console.warn('Falling back to default tenant ID - no tenant in localStorage');
+ }
+ return storedTenant || config.lf.tenantId;✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the tenant ID usage and initialization patterns.
Let me check how the tenant ID is used in the auth service to better understand the implications.
Let me check the auth service implementation to understand how the tenant ID is handled.
Let me check the config implementation to understand how the default tenant ID is configured.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
Using a fallback tenant ID is a valid and safe approach
The current implementation is appropriate because:
- The fallback tenant ID is configured through environment variables (
VUE_APP_LF_TENANT_ID) and is part of the application's configuration system - The auth service's
getTenantId()method is consistently used throughout the application for tenant ID retrieval - The fallback is necessary for initialization as the application operates in a multi-tenant mode (as seen in config's
tenantMode = 'multi') - Error handling for tenant-related issues exists at the service level, ensuring problems are caught and handled appropriately
While logging could be added, it's not critical since:
- The fallback is an expected behavior, not an error condition
- The tenant ID is properly managed through the auth lifecycle (set during login, cleared during logout)
- Service-level error handling already covers tenant-related issues
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for localStorage.getItem('currentTenant') usage
rg "localStorage.getItem\('currentTenant'\)" -A 3
Length of output: 761
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for tenant-related patterns
rg "tenantId|currentTenant" -A 3
# Also check for any tenant-related configuration
fd "config" --extension ts --extension js --exec rg "tenant" {} -A 2
Length of output: 69410
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for getTenantId implementation and usage in auth service
ast-grep --pattern 'getTenantId() {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any tenant-related error handling
rg "tenant.*error|error.*tenant" -A 2
Length of output: 10241
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for auth service implementation
cat frontend/src/modules/auth/services/auth.service.ts
Length of output: 748
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check config implementation and environment variable usage
cat frontend/src/config.js
# Also check for any environment files that might set the tenant ID
fd -e env -e env.example -e env.local -e env.development -e env.production --exec cat {}
Length of output: 11213
| if (!tenantId) { | ||
| return { rows: [], count: 0 }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider consistent error handling across all tenant-dependent methods
The null check for tenantId is currently only implemented in queryProjectGroups(), but all other methods in this service also depend on a valid tenant ID. Similar protection should be added to all methods to prevent potential API errors.
Here are the methods that need the same protection:
findSegment()listSegmentsByIds()updateSegment()createProjectGroup()queryProjects()createProject()createSubProject()getUser()fetchAuditLogs()
The original suggestion to extract this check into a utility function is valid and would help maintain consistency across all these methods.
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider consistent error handling across all tenant-dependent methods
While this defensive check prevents the initial project query failure, similar protection might be needed in other methods that depend on tenant ID.
Consider extracting this check into a utility function and applying it consistently:
+ static handleMissingTenant() {
+ if (!AuthService.getTenantId()) {
+ console.warn('Operation skipped - no tenant ID available');
+ return { rows: [], count: 0 };
+ }
+ return null;
+ }
static async queryProjectGroups(body) {
const tenantId = AuthService.getTenantId();
- if (!tenantId) {
- return { rows: [], count: 0 };
- }
+ const emptyResult = LfService.handleMissingTenant();
+ if (emptyResult) return emptyResult;Let's check other methods that might need similar protection:
The previous search revealed many usages of getTenantId() across the codebase, but we need to focus specifically on the lf-segments-service.js file to see which methods need similar protection. Let's analyze the methods in this file to make a more targeted recommendation.
Let's try using ripgrep instead to analyze the methods in lf-segments-service.js that use getTenantId() and see their surrounding context to determine which ones need similar null checks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all methods that use getTenantId
ast-grep --pattern 'AuthService.getTenantId()' -A 5
Length of output: 66080
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all methods in lf-segments-service.js that use getTenantId() and check if they have null checks
ast-grep --pattern 'const tenantId = AuthService.getTenantId()' -f frontend/src/modules/lf/segments/lf-segments-service.js -A 5
Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all methods in lf-segments-service.js that use getTenantId()
rg "const tenantId = AuthService.getTenantId\(\)" frontend/src/modules/lf/segments/lf-segments-service.js -A 5 -B 2
Length of output: 2238
Changes proposed ✍️
What
copilot:summary
copilot:poem
Why
How
copilot:walkthrough
Checklist ✅
Feature,Improvement, orBug.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes