-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Anyone willing to pick this up? #332
Comments
I believe this can be closed as @pusalieth seems to be working on their fork |
I'm going to be throwing some pretty heavy time into this, so up to you guys. Hopefully in the end it'll all get merged upstream. |
Idc about the main repo, you're the one who's putting his time into it, so
your fork is the one I'll be using
…On Thu., Apr. 30, 2020, 02:17 pusalieth, ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm going to be throwing some pretty heavy time into this, so up to you
guys. Hopefully in the end it'll all get merged upstream.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#332 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFI3T7S7IY6ZGW4WP7GEDUDRPC7SRANCNFSM4MT2NAXA>
.
|
@pusalieth gonna leave this here: mp3's work just fine on Linux, without that change. |
@jardayn |
@pusalieth Versions (tell me if i missed anything) Ubuntu 18.04 |
@pusalieth I don't have a full understanding of all this stuff yet but I'm willing to help where I can. If you take this and work on it, we can just work out of your fork. There are already good solutions for video that are maintained, we need something in the audio world that is also maintained. |
@jardayn |
@pusalieth I was using the original version with none of your changes present. |
@jardayn What command did you run? What OS are you using? And what is the path of the file you input? |
@pusalieth Versions (tell me if i missed anything) Ubuntu 18.04 mp3's were in the root directory |
I'm sure this makes no difference to you, but I want to make a note that this project was my thesis and nothing more. Making it open-source was one of the goals, but beyond a working prototype there were no real plans of maintaining it long-term. While I cannot share all the differences and improvements from our implementation at Resemble.AI and this one, I can definitely shed light on what is worth rewriting for this project:
|
@jardayn I can tell you I'd only want to install pytorch from conda. There's so many dependencies, and conda already has the work done. |
@CorentinJ Just out of curiosity, It's looks like you worked on it for a year or so past your thesis. Did you get hired, or co-found? |
@pusalieth also why Conda? Lots of people are using normal python venvs. @CorentinJ thanks for the info. Yeah, there are loads of way of improving this. |
I finished my thesis around June last year and got offers as soon as I made the repo public. I started working immediately after that. I did expect to maintain the project a little more than that, but it was without accounting for the fact that I would work in a very similar vein, and thus having to keep the advancements for myself. |
Well it's kinda sad to see this go behind a paywall, I myself am trying to
use this for my open source Discord Bot, so it's really sad to see this
paywalled behind resemble.ai, a free open source API never hurt anyone
…On Sun., May 3, 2020, 20:35 Corentin Jemine, ***@***.***> wrote:
I finished my thesis around June last year and got offers as soon as I
made the repo public. I started working immediately after that. I did
expect to maintain the project a little more than that, but it was without
accounting for the fact that I would work in a very similar vein, and thus
having to keep the advancements for myself.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#332 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFI3T7WWKIFOMYC3RMKBRNDRPW2QDANCNFSM4MT2NAXA>
.
|
@adrifcastr Got a link to the bot? Also Open Source API's hurt the income of people. Not surprised that the best stuff is commercial. |
here you go, and well, I'm also not making money of my API, I just provide it. |
But for what Jemine is working, there are commercial applications, so... yeah. I mean, if you want Voice Gen, there's Mozilla TTS |
well TTS and voice cloning aren't exactly the same, I don't need a TTS
service, I need to replicate a voice, that's all
…On Mon., May 4, 2020, 00:35 jardayn, ***@***.***> wrote:
But for what Jemine is working, there are commercial applications, so...
yeah.
I mean, if you want Voice Gen, there's Mozilla TTS
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#332 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFI3T7QVDNQ5SHL6ODDAALDRPXWUBANCNFSM4MT2NAXA>
.
|
I don't want to get into the tit for tat, which is where I think this thread seems to be going. If people want to release open source, it's their choice. Or they can monetize it, and if it's valuable enough to people who can't do it themselves, they'll buy it and that's literally the definition of commerce. Doesn't matter either way to me, but I do prefer open source, and here's why. Linux, Apache, SQL, and php were/are the backbone of the internet, and all 4 are open source. All major corporation servers are open source. SSL is open source. Google runs 99% open source, including their products, like Android, YouTube, etc. Facebook almost completely runs on open source. Literally the richest software companies in the world run on open source. So, wealth generation and source type are not inextricably linked. There's a few exceptions, but the majority of wealthy corporations run the majority of their software using open source. Open source benefits the maximal amount of people with the least of amount of money. That's why I would choose open source over closed 80% of the time. The only trouble is certain pieces of software, it's extremely hard to monetize, so they use walled gardens instead. When it comes to AI, I'm in full support of OpenAI objectives. This is the prime time to make everything open source, and sell the models, or usage. That's just my opinion. |
Lads if you want to ask Resemble.AI to make the project open source, you go ahead and do it. If you expect a student who just finished university to work full-time on his own and for free on an open source project, you've probably never put a foot in the real world. The closest to what you're asking is Mozilla's repo.
Yeah they are the same, and you'll get all the features in this repo from Mozzila's repo. Last I checked, erogol had a lot of features from different papers implemented, including sv2tts. |
@pusalieth I should've rephrased that the Open Source comments were in relation to AI. essentially what @CorentinJ said:
|
Thanks for refering to Mozilla TTS. However, I should emphasize that I did not "copy" anything from here. And yet I' I'd be happy to cite your code as you implemented it before. |
Yeah I should have worded it better. Sorry about that, I will correct it. |
I believe this can be closed as @CorentinJ has outlined a vision for continued development, and is allowing the community to provide contributions to the repo. See #364 |
It's always sad when a really cool open source project gets abandoned to go commercial. Is there anyone else who is willing to pick this up and keep it going?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: