Skip to content

docs: use current CWL product names - #64

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/current-product-names
Open

docs: use current CWL product names#64
seonghobae wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/current-product-names

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Purpose

Replace two materially stale ecosystem product names in AGENTS.md:

  • waf-ids-ai-socwardnet;
  • feelanet-adfskeyverse.

Scope

This is a one-file documentation correction based directly on protected main. It changes no dependency, lock, workflow, security policy, reviewer credential, runtime behavior, database object, or release authority.

It supersedes mixed-scope PR #44, which combined the same documentation change with an unrelated cryptography lock refresh already owned by the focused security lane #51.

Merge gate

Merge only after exact-current-head documentation/security/review checks and all live branch-protection requirements pass. No evidence from #44 transfers.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 문서
    • 생태계 구성 요소 목록에서 waf-ids-ai-socwardnet으로 변경했습니다.
    • feelanet-adfskeyverse로 변경했습니다.
    • 각 구성 요소의 설명은 기존과 동일하게 유지됩니다.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 97d6ac95-d76d-48ca-95fe-b0a8a9d6a09e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e48aa13 and 4b78611.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • AGENTS.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

AGENTS.md의 생태계 목록에서 waf-ids-ai-socwardnet으로, feelanet-adfskeyverse로 변경했습니다. 설명과 다른 항목은 유지했습니다.

Changes

생태계 명칭 갱신

Layer / File(s) Summary
프로젝트 명칭 교체
AGENTS.md
생태계 목록의 두 프로젝트 명칭을 wardnetkeyverse로 변경했습니다. 각 항목의 설명은 유지했습니다.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 4b786

This is a localized documentation correction with no runtime, dependency, security, or deployment behavior change; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed 제목은 문서에서 오래된 CWL 제품명을 현재 제품명으로 변경하는 주요 변경 사항을 정확하고 간결하게 설명합니다.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/current-product-names

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 4b786119006c7a46ce1098d704bb67e01db5c3a7.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 4b786119006c7a46ce1098d704bb67e01db5c3a7
  • Workflow run: 32132181560
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 4b786119006c7a46ce1098d704bb67e01db5c3a7.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.

Findings

1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval

  • Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for 4b786119006c7a46ce1098d704bb67e01db5c3a7.
  • Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
  • Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
  • Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.

Failed checks:

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: AGENTS.md"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot added priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work status: needs-review Open pull request requiring current-head review or checks type: docs Documentation, ADR, PRD, or technical writing labels Aug 22, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

Review failed

An error occurred during the review process. Please try again later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

priority: medium Normal-priority or P2 work status: needs-review Open pull request requiring current-head review or checks type: docs Documentation, ADR, PRD, or technical writing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant