docs: reconcile product and technical gap baseline - #625
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughScopeWeave의 제품·기술 기준선 문서를 갱신했다. 기준일, 제품 범위, 구현 추적성, Gap 상태, exact-head 증거와 검증 기준을 반영했다. Doctoring 기록에 PR 상태와 Changes제품 기술 기준선
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This documentation-only change does not alter runtime behavior or workflow ownership, and no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@opencode-agent review\n\nReview only exact current head 664b501 against protected develop@2c328875e00e86537df3e965170be80532571cad. This is a documentation-only baseline update. Verify that the #625 entry separates immutable predecessor evidence from live PR metadata and that the documented #610/#495/#593/#608 queue facts are consistent with their exact heads and fail-closed gate/approval evidence. Submit a formal current-head verdict only; do not mutate, rebase, force-push, merge, or weaken gates. |
Summary
Validation
Docs-only change; no runtime dependencies or workflow ownership changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit