Skip to content

docs: reconcile product and technical gap baseline - #625

Open
seonghobae wants to merge 115 commits into
developfrom
docs/reconcile-product-technical-gap-baseline-20260828
Open

docs: reconcile product and technical gap baseline#625
seonghobae wants to merge 115 commits into
developfrom
docs/reconcile-product-technical-gap-baseline-20260828

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add a protected-develop product and technical gap baseline with exact-head PR traceability
  • distinguish shipped behavior from open PR submissions
  • preserve APA 7th standards, PM research, accessibility, security, and operational evidence links

Validation

  • python3 -m pytest tests/config (3 passed)
  • git diff --cached --check

Docs-only change; no runtime dependencies or workflow ownership changes.


Devin Review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 문서
    • 제품 및 기술 기준선을 2026년 8월 29일 기준으로 갱신했습니다.
    • 제품 목표와 요구사항 추적성 정보를 최신 구현 증거에 맞게 정리했습니다.
    • 정적 배포 성공 및 공개 응답 확인 정보를 추가했습니다.
    • 주요 작업의 병합, 검토, 테스트 및 승인 상태를 명확히 구분했습니다.
    • 빈 상태 화면의 접근성과 애플리케이션 요청 제한 관련 수정 사항을 기록했습니다.
    • 진행 중인 작업과 확인된 구현 증거를 구분하고, 품질·보안 기준 및 국제 표준 근거를 보강했습니다.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 54ab5993-8b24-4d41-aa05-fab3fe982bf6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cad385f and bc93898.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

ScopeWeave의 제품·기술 기준선 문서를 갱신했다. 기준일, 제품 범위, 구현 추적성, Gap 상태, exact-head 증거와 검증 기준을 반영했다. Doctoring 기록에 PR 상태와 #608, #587 수리 상태를 추가했다.

Changes

제품 기술 기준선

Layer / File(s) Summary
기준선 범위와 구현 추적성
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
기준일과 제품 범위를 유지했다. PRD/TRD 추적성의 #621 구현 증거와 정적 배포 증거를 갱신했다. UML 및 데이터 흐름 정의를 유지했다.
Gap 및 검증 증거
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md, docs/doctoring/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
G-01~G-05와 exact-head evidence를 갱신했다. #621, #625, #629, #596, #506, #503, #507, #601의 상태와 증거를 반영했다. #495 항목을 삭제했다. Doctoring 기록에 #608 접근성 수리와 #587 rate-limit 경계 수리 상태를 추가했다.
표준 및 연구 근거
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
품질·보안 기준선과 ISO 21502, ISO 21511, ISO 21508, WCAG 2.2, NIST SSDF 1.1 및 APA 7th 참고문헌을 유지했다.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to bc938

This documentation-only change does not alter runtime behavior or workflow ownership, and no actionable merge-blocking risk remains beyond normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed 제목은 제품 및 기술 갭 기준선 문서를 조정하는 주요 변경 사항을 정확히 설명합니다.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/reconcile-product-technical-gap-baseline-20260828

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@opencode-agent review\n\nReview only exact current head 664b501 against protected develop@2c328875e00e86537df3e965170be80532571cad. This is a documentation-only baseline update. Verify that the #625 entry separates immutable predecessor evidence from live PR metadata and that the documented #610/#495/#593/#608 queue facts are consistent with their exact heads and fail-closed gate/approval evidence. Submit a formal current-head verdict only; do not mutate, rebase, force-push, merge, or weaken gates.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant