feat(billing): persist Checkout attempt idempotency - #511
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedAn error occurred during the review process. Please try again later. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughStripe Checkout에 영속적 시도 저장소와 idempotency key 재사용을 추가했습니다. 네트워크 오류와 5xx는 ChangesStripe Checkout 멱등성
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~45 minutes Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to This change makes Checkout retry identity durable, but a malformed successful provider response could still lead to a second Checkout Session, and clock rollback could prevent recording a completed payment attempt and return an error. The PR is not merge-ready until these bounded correctness risks are fixed or explicitly accepted. Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant createCheckout
participant billingCheckoutAttempts
participant Stripe
Client->>createCheckout: Checkout 요청
createCheckout->>billingCheckoutAttempts: startAttempt(orgId, priceId)
billingCheckoutAttempts-->>createCheckout: attemptId와 idempotencyKey
createCheckout->>Stripe: Checkout 요청과 idempotencyKey
Stripe-->>createCheckout: 세션 또는 오류 응답
createCheckout->>billingCheckoutAttempts: provider 상태 저장
createCheckout-->>Client: URL, checkoutAttemptId 또는 오류
Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32128451685
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32137124509
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32146797387
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32166023926
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32173165713
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32188792061
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32198079381
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32203722262
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32212792113
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32220488614
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b. -
Head SHA:
0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b -
Workflow run: 32228450200
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage Decision
- Result: FAIL
- Test evidence: not proven passing
- Docstring evidence: not proven passing when configured
- Failure count: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (5 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Docs (2 files)"]
S2 --> I2["operator or user guidance"]
I2 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V2["docs review"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (7 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> Conflict["Merge conflict blocks this path"]
Conflict --> V3["targeted test run"]
opencode-agent
Bot
added
priority: medium
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Stale predecessor-head OpenCode verdict. This review explicitly evaluates 0b0a937; the current contributor head is 8b192ab on current parent 5d1bf1b, with current-head coverage/opencode evidence regenerated and the inline findings resolved. Dismissal removes predecessor-only review state and does not constitute approval or merge authority.
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| function markKnownProviderFailure(repository, attemptId, error) { | ||
| if (error?.providerOutcomeKnown !== true) return; | ||
| try { | ||
| repository.markProviderFailed({ attemptId }); | ||
| } catch { | ||
| throw checkoutStateFailure(); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 Info: Attempt is closed only on non-409 4xx, which is duplicate-safe
The only path that frees an org/price to mint a fresh key is markKnownProviderFailure firing on providerOutcomeKnown, which is true only for 4xx other than 409. Network/abort, 5xx, 409, and every malformed or untrusted 2xx keep the attempt pending. Since a non-409 4xx means Stripe rejected the request before creating a Session, reuse after correction cannot duplicate a provider side effect.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
1 participant
Buyer and reliability impact
This bounded stacked #488 slice adds the durable Checkout-attempt boundary required before ScopeWeave can safely retry an uncertain Stripe Checkout Session creation without manufacturing duplicate sessions. It preserves #507's trusted origin, direct transport, response bounds, destination validation, and sanitized errors while making retry identity durable and explicitly fail-closed.
Exact current stack and scope
fix/stripe-checkout-provider-boundary-488@f1ca84bab7603cb0882c1a5b4d822c5714daacdb.2743a58c9ac65ab125c3898ec94370a7dc91f095.0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34band exact current parentf1ca84bab7603cb0882c1a5b4d822c5714daacdb.CHANGELOG.mdandpackage.jsonwere semantically combined so the parent registrations and the billing attempt tests/coverage all remain present.docs/doctoring/stripe-checkout-attempt-idempotency.mdnow names the exact current parent rather than the superseded stack tip.No auth/session, Clearfolio, attachment, workflow, lockfile, or branch-protection artifact is changed by the effective child diff.
Implemented durable-attempt contract
server/billing_checkout_attempt.mjsowns bootstrap-installed SQLite attempt state with descriptive multiwordsnake_caseobjects and no request-time DDL;reconciliation_required, preventing a speculative fresh key;pendingandreconciliation_requiredattempts for one organization/price pair;provider_failedso a deliberate future checkout may receive fresh authority;created_at_ms, preserving database invariants under clock rollback;STRIPE_PRICE_IDreturns the billing-configuration 503 boundary before repository mutation;TDD and review-driven causal repairs
The attempt contract and persistence tests preceded implementation. CodeRabbit identified substantive defects around stale state vocabulary, clock rollback, malformed successful provider representations, and missing price configuration. Those findings were repaired at the causal layer. Current source treats unusable 2xx representations as uncertain, retains the pending attempt, clamps terminal timestamps, and uses
reconciliation_requiredconsistently.The current stack repair starts from the exact parent tree, overlays only the fourteen child-owned paths, and additively merges shared package/changelog evidence. The effective parent→child diff therefore contains no unintended deletion of the parent OpenCode/orchestrator registrations or provider-boundary regression surface.
The operator escape hatch intentionally remains a separate authority slice rather than being invented inside the attempt repository. Stacked PR #516 adds the audited reconciliation backlog, tenant-safe inspection, and operator resolution persistence boundary.
Current exact-head evidence
Fresh repository-native workflows for exact child head
2743a58c9ac65ab125c3898ec94370a7dc91f095are queued and therefore non-passing:32267954592;32267954597; and32267955087.All formal OpenCode
CHANGES_REQUESTEDverdicts currently visible are bound to predecessor0b0a9373870860a18ba5fc5f36d660f72354a34b; none transfers to the changed head. All currently enumerated inline review threads are resolved. There is no qualifying independent current-head approval. Queued, pending, skipped-required, neutral, absent, cancelled, failed, stale, predecessor, status-only, synthetic-only, author-only, or model-only evidence is non-passing.This PR is Ready for review but must not integrate independently of #507 and #505.
Scope boundary
This slice does not implement signed webhook processing, authoritative subscription reconciliation, entitlements, or release acceptance and does not close #488.
Merge gate
After the prerequisite stack reaches protected
develop, reconcile this bounded semantic diff onto the resulting live head and require every then-applicable exact-head CI/browser/coverage/docstring, SAST/security/dependency/supply-chain, package/provenance, resolved-thread, and qualifying independent-approval gate actually required by live policy. No predecessor-head, author-only, skipped, status-only, synthetic, or model-only evidence transfers.Refs #488