🎨 Palette: 키보드 접근성을 위한 툴팁 포커스 기능 추가

[seonghobae]

💡 무엇을

• index.html의 전체 요약 카드(.meta-value-card) 3곳에 tabindex="0"을 부여했습니다.
• app.js에서 생성되는 상태 뱃지(.status-badge) 중 툴팁(description)이 존재하는 경우 tabindex=0을 부여하도록 수정했습니다.
• styles.css에 .meta-value-card:focus-visible 및 .status-badge:focus-visible 선택자를 추가하여 키보드 탐색 시 시각적 포커스 인디케이터가 표시되도록 구현했습니다.

🎯 왜

기존에는 title이나 aria-label 속성으로 유용한 툴팁 정보를 제공함에도 불구하고, 대상 요소가 div나 span 같은 비대화형 요소라서 키보드 포커스를 받을 수 없었습니다. 따라서 스크린 리더 및 키보드 전용 탐색 사용자에게는 해당 설명 정보가 누락되는 접근성 문제가 발생했습니다.

📸 변경 전/후

• 전: 마우스 커서를 올려야만 툴팁 확인 가능. 키보드 Tab 이동 시 요약 카드나 상태 뱃지를 건너뜀.
• 후: 키보드 Tab을 사용하여 요약 카드와 상태 뱃지에 접근 시 뚜렷한 파란색 윤곽선이 표시되며 툴팁 정보가 스크린 리더로 전달 가능함.

♿ 접근성

툴팁을 포함하는 비대화형 요소에 키보드 접근성을 부여함으로써, 시각 장애인 및 키보드 탐색 사용자가 서비스 요약 정보와 진행 상태 상세 설명을 모두 인지할 수 있게 되었습니다.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6491857527000603812 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 42 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2113f1c8-a9d3-4ee6-ac6c-b2bbcd46d592

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a756b7e and f379046.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• verification.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• videos/page@8eb0d895ecf21ce4c9ec8b5944ee4ab1.webm is excluded by !**/*.webm

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .jules/palette.md
• app.js
• index.html
• styles.css
• verify.cjs

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[opencode-agent]

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head f3790467c8b940f79b884437f52f456424358009.

• Head SHA: f3790467c8b940f79b884437f52f456424358009

• Workflow run: 30463115096

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (7 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (7 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: f3790467c8b940f79b884437f52f456424358009
• Workflow run: 30463115096
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

• Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

• Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

• Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

• Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

• Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

• Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head f3790467c8b940f79b884437f52f456424358009.

• Head SHA: f3790467c8b940f79b884437f52f456424358009

• Workflow run: 30463115096

• Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (7 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (7 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]

Loading

[seonghobae]

Closing as obsolete duplicate in the PR queue cleanup. Keep latest candidates: #386 (security hono+CSV), #385 (focus restore), #384 (padStart), #381/#380 (analytics), #367 (playwright). Prefer landing one green PR per theme over stacked Jules/agent clones.

[google-labs-jules]

Closing as obsolete duplicate in the PR queue cleanup. Keep latest candidates: #386 (security hono+CSV), #385 (focus restore), #384 (padStart), #381/#380 (analytics), #367 (playwright). Prefer landing one green PR per theme over stacked Jules/agent clones.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.