⚡ Bolt: [퍼포먼스 개선] 리소스 힌트(modulepreload) 적용 및 중복 preload 제거 - #334
⚡ Bolt: [퍼포먼스 개선] 리소스 힌트(modulepreload) 적용 및 중복 preload 제거#334seonghobae wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head68fb3102b6157993e6c7130e5a96522bf2bf49ec. -
Head SHA:
68fb3102b6157993e6c7130e5a96522bf2bf49ec -
Workflow run: 29672747497
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["CI script: static_coverage_evidence.mjs"]
S2 --> I2["review and security gate shell path"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: CI script: static_coverage_evidence.mjs"]
R2 --> V2["bash -n plus Strix self-test"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (4 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (4 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["CI script: static_coverage_evidence.mjs"]
S2 --> I2["review and security gate shell path"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: CI script: static_coverage_evidence.mjs"]
R2 --> V2["bash -n plus Strix self-test"]
|
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
1 participant
💡 What
index.html에서 불필요하게 작성된<link rel="preload" href="styles.css" as="style" />구문을 제거했습니다.<link rel="modulepreload">를cloud-sync.js및analytics.js에 추가했습니다.🎯 Why
<link rel="preload">는 바로 뒤에 오는 실제<link rel="stylesheet">와 동시에 발견되므로, 모던 브라우저에서는 이점이 전혀 없는 불필요한 중복 코드입니다.<link rel="modulepreload">를 활용하면 브라우저가 하단 스크립트 모듈 의존성들을 렌더링 블로킹 없이 병렬로 미리 가져오기 때문에 초기 자바스크립트 로딩 시간을 유의미하게 단축할 수 있습니다.📊 Impact
preload제거로 불필요한 바이트를 줄이고,modulepreload의 추가를 통해 애플리케이션의 핵심 JavaScript 번들이 조기 로드되어 TTI(Time To Interactive)가 개선됩니다. (네트워크 탭상 리소스 발견 시점 앞당김)🔬 Measurement
cloud-sync.js와analytics.js의 다운로드가 더 빠른 시점에 시작되는지 확인할 수 있습니다.CI=true pnpm test:e2e테스트 통과 및 모든 Playwright Assertion 정상 동작 확인 완료.PR created automatically by Jules for task 17518908842790700224 started by @seonghobae