⚡ Bolt: 셀 렌더링 내부 요소의 DOM 할당 최적화 - #333
Conversation
💡 What: 테이블 셀 내부 요소(작업자 배지, 상태 배지, 진척도 라벨 등)를 `document.createElement` 대신 미리 생성된 템플릿의 `.cloneNode(false)`를 사용하도록 수정했습니다. 🎯 Why: 수천 개의 행을 렌더링할 때 매번 DOM 엘리먼트를 새로 생성하는 것은 JS-to-C++ 할당 오버헤드를 발생시킵니다. 이미 행(row)과 셀(cell)에 템플릿 캐싱이 적용되어 있었으나, 셀 내부의 뱃지와 라벨에는 적용되지 않아 병목이 있었습니다. 📊 Impact: 테이블 전체 렌더링 시간 감소 및 메모리 할당 빈도 감소. 🔬 Measurement: 대량의 태스크(수백~수천 개)를 렌더링할 때 크롬 DevTools의 Performance 탭에서 렌더링(스크립팅) 시간이 단축되는지 확인.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head33d4c920249645b8256d917940df54551a980ed1. -
Head SHA:
33d4c920249645b8256d917940df54551a980ed1 -
Workflow run: 29649273860
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
1 participant
💡 What:
테이블 셀 내부 요소(작업자 배지, 상태 배지, 진척도 라벨 등)를
document.createElement대신 미리 생성된 템플릿의.cloneNode(false)를 사용하도록 수정했습니다.🎯 Why:
수천 개의 행을 렌더링할 때 매번 DOM 엘리먼트를 새로 생성하는 것은 JS-to-C++ 할당 오버헤드를 발생시킵니다. 이미 행(row)과 셀(cell)에 템플릿 캐싱이 적용되어 있었으나, 셀 내부의 뱃지와 라벨에는 적용되지 않아 병목이 있었습니다.
📊 Impact:
테이블 전체 렌더링 시간 감소 및 메모리 할당 빈도 감소.
🔬 Measurement:
대량의 태스크(수백~수천 개)를 렌더링할 때 크롬 DevTools의 Performance 탭에서 렌더링(스크립팅) 시간이 단축되는지 확인.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 4777781767277273796 started by @seonghobae