refactor(results): use semantic result application identifiers - #324
Draft
seonghobae wants to merge 19 commits into
Draft
refactor(results): use semantic result application identifiers#324seonghobae wants to merge 19 commits into
seonghobae wants to merge 19 commits into
Conversation
|
Important Draft PR not reviewedDraft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.
To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration: reviews:
auto_review:
drafts: trueThanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Non-destructively compose current semantic-naming Draft #324 with exact authority predecessor #27722556ad. The merge tree takes Result Application production/tests from #277, which now contains the semantic private vocabulary plus public compatibility guards, while preserving #324-owned architecture/changelog/doctoring/gap documentation. No predecessor check or review evidence transfers.
seonghobae
changed the base branch from
main
to
fix/result-application-snapshot-b84f0c9
September 2, 2026 09:43
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Documentation child after source-lane convergence
This Draft began as a direct-main Result Application semantic-naming source/docs lane. That ancestry was wrong because the source/test authority already belonged to #277. The unique source/test semantic delta was folded into #277; this child now owns documentation-only follow-through.
Fresh exact stack
main:bdff1273d3885dedc5187632e1c8838b470c9b6d;58fc952c3ce4e02553b52914f89e58974b1a6262onfix/result-application-snapshot-b84f0c9;520a3e89157a49d9d69a848fdbf212edf497bf1c;ARCHITECTURE.md,CHANGELOG.md,docs/doctoring/result-application-semantic-identifiers.md, anddocs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md.The earlier body described predecessor head
6d1bf448...and older parent7797b3c...; those identities and any associated checks/reviews are historical after non-destructive convergence.Source and documentation ownership
#277 owns the Result Application production/test authority, including snapshot integrity and private semantic naming while retaining the released public compatibility surface. This child must not regain duplicate production authority.
The remaining four-file documentation delta overlaps the canonical documentation owner path. Keep it Draft until its unique decision/traceability content is either protected-integrated or demonstrably inherited in full by the canonical docs successor. Documentation-only status is not a reason to close it.
Exact-current evidence
Fresh workflow inventory for exact
520a3e89157a49d9d69a848fdbf212edf497bf1ccontains Release Acceptance33711420505, currently queued and non-passing. No predecessor workflow/review result transfers. Absence of formal review is not approval.Integration boundary
Keep Draft while #277 and dependency-root #233 remain unintegrated. After the source chain reaches protected main, reconcile this child non-destructively onto the then-current canonical documentation/base path and reacquire every applicable exact-final-head/current-base documentation-contract, CI/security, package/provenance/release, review, and thread gate.
No force push, destructive rebase, protected-main direct write, self-approval, gate weakening, stale evidence transfer, or unverified close/supersession.