Skip to content

docs: converge #687 rate-limit reader authority - #688

Merged
seonghobae merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/noema-687-authority-20260913
Sep 12, 2026
Merged

docs: converge #687 rate-limit reader authority#688
seonghobae merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
docs/noema-687-authority-20260913

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documentation authority RED

Protected source now includes merged #687 exact 98ec07552f4081bd4ff6b25f1f3ed691c0f3f2b9, but the canonical CHANGELOG/product-gap authority still ends at #685. Test-only exact d22f6eb48550b50abed8e19bc17ca884a62727cf requires #687's 256-byte request / 4,096-byte decision locked-reader normalization, stable diagnostics, immutable-release separation, and non-transfer of foreign authority before documentation can be considered current.

This lane is documentation/test authority only; runtime source is not to be changed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 버그 수정

    • 분산 /exchange 요청에서 이미 잠긴 본문을 읽지 못할 때 기존 400 malformed_json 응답 계약을 유지합니다.
    • rate-limit 결정 응답을 읽을 수 없는 경우 안정적인 진단 메시지와 함께 안전하게 실패합니다.
  • 문서

    • 관련 동작과 권한 경계를 변경 로그 및 기술 기준 문서에 기록했습니다.
  • 테스트

    • 잠긴 요청·응답 본문 처리와 기존 오류 계약을 검증하는 테스트를 추가했습니다.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: cd2cdc7e-7fed-483e-a661-ff900f4fbb92

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9d08f4 and 3633647.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
  • test/documentation-codegraph-locked-body-current.test.ts

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

PR #687의 rate-limit reader 획득 실패 계약을 changelog와 기술 baseline에 기록하고, 관련 source 구조와 권한 경계를 검증하는 문서를 추가합니다.

Changes

Rate-limit reader 획득 계약

Layer / File(s) Summary
Reader 획득 실패 계약 기록
CHANGELOG.md, docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md
잠긴 256-byte request는 400 malformed_json으로 처리하고, 잠긴 4,096-byte decision response는 안정적인 rate-limit Durable Object decision body could not be read 진단으로 처리하는 계약을 기록합니다. 기존 reader-lock, byte limit, JSON admission 및 권한 경계를 유지한다고 명시합니다.
Baseline 및 문서화 검증
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md, test/documentation-codegraph-locked-body-current.test.ts
보호된 source 식별자와 PR 기록을 갱신합니다. 테스트는 관련 commit hash, body 크기, 진단 문구, getReader()try/catch 구조 및 권한 유지 문구를 확인합니다.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Other

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/noema-687-authority-20260913

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review September 12, 2026 18:56

@seonghobae seonghobae left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Exact-head review on 3633647b5531bad3649c62751c1b5a40356b94f7: the three-file diff is documentation/test authority only, accurately reflects merged #687 source semantics, preserves immutable-release and foreign-owner boundaries, and does not alter runtime source. Hosted application CI, reviewer-ci, Security Scan, and patch-validator-image are all terminal SUCCESS on this head; no unresolved inline threads or actionable review finding remain. This is a COMMENT review, not self-approval.

@seonghobae
seonghobae merged commit f5107e7 into main Sep 12, 2026
17 of 18 checks passed
@seonghobae
seonghobae deleted the docs/noema-687-authority-20260913 branch September 12, 2026 18:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant