Skip to content

🎨 Palette: Add ARIA labels to icon-only buttons - #289

Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
palette-a11y-icon-buttons-14396762746339436410
Closed

🎨 Palette: Add ARIA labels to icon-only buttons#289
seonghobae wants to merge 3 commits into
masterfrom
palette-a11y-icon-buttons-14396762746339436410

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Added aria-labels to icon-only buttons in TasksLayout and CalendarLayout.
🎯 Why: Improves screen reader accessibility by providing context to icon-only actions.
♿ Accessibility: Screen reader users can now understand the purpose of the More, Previous, Next, Settings, and Close buttons.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14396762746339436410 started by @seonghobae

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 52 minutes and 12 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bf50d3cd-e91a-4f2a-9221-0e6ed0f07bc5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29ea986 and 08e10f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .Jules/palette.md
  • .github/workflows/strix.yml
  • frontend/src/components/CalendarLayout.tsx
  • frontend/src/components/TasksLayout.tsx
  • scripts/ci/test_strix_quick_gate.sh
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch palette-a11y-icon-buttons-14396762746339436410

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR governance metadata gate is not ready for 08e10f28f146d4a3e8a4be44e8a871f554798705:

  • Merge state is DIRTY; resolve conflicts or refresh mergeability.
  • Current-head CodeRabbit issue comment has blocking warning/failure evidence on 08e10f2.

@seonghobae
seonghobae temporarily deployed to palette-a11y-icon-buttons-14396762746339436410 - naruon PR #289 May 28, 2026 18:25 — with Render Destroyed
@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #291. The accessible-label UI changes were reapplied on a clean master branch with tests and AGENTS guidance, while this branch also carries stale Strix workflow changes that conflict with the merged #288 provider governance.

@seonghobae seonghobae closed this May 28, 2026
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing in favor of #291. The accessible-label UI changes were reapplied on a clean master branch with tests and AGENTS guidance, while this branch also carries stale Strix workflow changes that conflict with the merged #288 provider governance.

Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant