docs: establish product technical gap baseline

[seonghobae]

Buyer/operator outcome

Creates the requested evidence-backed product and technical gap register and fixes its ownership boundary as ADR-0005.

• adds docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md;
• records buyer-visible gaps, current source evidence, owning repository boundaries, acceptance conditions, and the observed current PR queue;
• records the protected current-head loop and keeps central hourly scheduler/review ownership in ContextualWisdomLab/.github;
• adds APA 7th grounding for ISO/IEC 25010:2023, NIST SSDF/ABAC, OpenID Connect, and knowledge-graph integration;
• explicitly states that no Figma surface is introduced, so the ADR records Figma File ID: N/A;
• updates ADR index and CHANGELOG.md.

No runtime code, database schema, workflow, sibling repository, or confidential real-data fixture is changed.

Exact changed boundary

• CHANGELOG.md
• docs/adr/README.md
• docs/adr/0005-product-technical-gap-baseline.md
• docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

Verification

• git diff --check passed.
• The document records the develop snapshot and marks active PR SHAs as queue evidence only; current-head checks/reviews must be re-fetched before merge.
• No tests/real_datasets content was read, copied, or uploaded.

Integration boundary

This PR is documentation-only. It does not copy central workflows, alter review keys, weaken security gates, dismiss reviews, or use an administrative merge path.

---

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 35 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

Wait for the limit to reset, then comment @coderabbitai review or push new commits to the PR.

An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 5a266f3c-dc7d-432f-bcfe-8d5627adebe7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c9bfba2 and 49a9317.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• CHANGELOG.md
• docs/adr/0005-product-technical-gap-baseline.md
• docs/adr/README.md
• docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[seonghobae]

Current-head evidence for this documentation PR:

• HEAD: 49a9317cebe3c75235a90f29e9b1b750cfb97e37
• git diff --check: passed
• Changed files are limited to the gap baseline, ADR index/record, and Unreleased changelog.
• No runtime code, workflow, database schema, sibling repository, or tests/real_datasets content was changed or read.
• The baseline intentionally treats active PR SHAs as queue evidence only; merge decisions still require current-head reviews and required checks.

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

[seonghobae]

#1429 already owns the requested docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md path and contains the broader point-in-time 83-PR/GA-1 evidence. This PR is a duplicate implementation and will be closed so the repository keeps one canonical gap register. No runtime or confidential-data change is lost.