Skip to content

test(cdc): reproduce target capability metadata gap on current develop - #312

Merged
github-actions[bot] merged 6 commits into
developfrom
repro/cdc-target-capabilities-4408b60
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

test(cdc): reproduce target capability metadata gap on current develop#312
github-actions[bot] merged 6 commits into
developfrom
repro/cdc-target-capabilities-4408b60

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Rebuilds the truthful CDC target-capability boundary from exact protected develop@4408b6086fd725ff1629d8f048cf28f3a2b40b1b without transferring stale evidence from #255/#308.

Exact fail-first head: 6b8caee7714fdeb57f16aa7b3688febe76e4fa8b. This intentionally adds only CdcTargetCapabilityTest: the production CdcTargetConnector at the exact base still exposes scaffoldOnly() but no machine-readable capabilities() contract, while live Kafka and JDBC-replica product paths have intentionally unwired canonical write(...) methods.

Acceptance for RED: hosted CI must reach the CDC production-boundary test and fail because CdcTargetConnector.class.getMethods() contains no capabilities method, rather than due setup/import/fixture failure. Only after exact-head RED is proven should the narrow production capability metadata be implemented. No check/review from #255, #308, or another head transfers.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 109 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2bd4db34-9f4b-4f12-be96-1df7c9bd8d13

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4408b60 and 3407f73.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • cdc-service/src/main/java/com/xtrmetl/cdc/spi/CdcTargetConnector.java
  • cdc-service/src/main/java/com/xtrmetl/cdc/spi/JdbcReplicaCdcTargetConnector.java
  • cdc-service/src/main/java/com/xtrmetl/cdc/spi/KafkaCdcTargetConnector.java
  • cdc-service/src/test/java/com/xtrmetl/cdc/spi/CdcTargetCapabilityTest.java
  • etl-service/src/main/java/com/xtrmetl/etl/controller/EtlPayloadAdmissionAdvice.java
  • etl-service/src/test/java/com/xtrmetl/etl/controller/EtlHttpPayloadAdmissionTest.java
  • etl-service/src/test/java/com/xtrmetl/etl/controller/EtlPayloadAdmissionAdviceTest.java

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

* test(etl): reproduce HTTP payload materialization on live develop

* fix(etl): bound HTTP payloads before MVC materialization

* test(security): replay Jackson LTS baseline on live develop

* fix(security): align Jackson with patched 2.21 LTS BOM

* test(security): reject Jackson BOM decoy evidence

* test(security): validate Jackson BOM structurally

* test(etl): preserve payload boundary acceptance cases
@seonghobae
seonghobae marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2026 08:40
@github-actions
github-actions Bot merged commit 8f96517 into develop Aug 13, 2026
35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant