Skip to content

feat(web): build the Today action loop - #63

Merged
seonghobae merged 12 commits into
mainfrom
feat/today-action-loop
Aug 3, 2026
Merged

feat(web): build the Today action loop#63
seonghobae merged 12 commits into
mainfrom
feat/today-action-loop

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Implements the first reviewable slice of #62, the current highest-impact buyer gap in #21.

  • replaces the static home placeholder with an accessible responsive Today workspace
  • captures bounded visible actions using browser-generated UUIDv4 identifiers
  • makes the three-priority capacity explicit and enforces it in the domain model
  • schedules committed actions in 15-minute increments with bounded durations and deterministic overlap rejection
  • records completion evidence without hiding unfinished or completed work
  • persists only a versioned browser-local draft, rejects malformed/oversized state, and resets cleanly on the next local day
  • labels the local-only trust boundary so users are not misled into believing draft actions are synchronized
  • adds pure domain tests for priority limits, opaque identifiers, schedule conflicts, completion, persistence, rollover, duplicate evidence, and ownership-field injection
  • adds Playwright evidence for capture-to-completion, reload persistence, priority capacity, keyboard-addressable controls, and mobile viewport usability

Deferred

Authenticated workspace derivation, planning-service synchronization, optimistic concurrency, calendar synchronization, habits/review evidence, offline mutation queues, localization, and production telemetry remain separate slices.

Validation gate

Merge only when CI, AppGuardrail, SAST Semgrep, Security Scan, Commercial Readiness, CodeRabbit, and all human/security review feedback pass on the exact head with no unresolved actionable findings.

Refs #62 and #21.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 41 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e90fbead-ff25-4a42-8570-339678afea8f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14886ff and 7d15d7c.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • apps/web/app/page.tsx
  • apps/web/app/styles.css
  • apps/web/app/today-client.tsx
  • apps/web/app/today-state.test.ts
  • apps/web/app/today-state.ts
  • apps/web/app/today-storage.ts
  • apps/web/e2e/today-flow.spec.ts
  • apps/web/package.json
  • apps/web/playwright.config.ts

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant