feat(calendar): require trusted workspace context - #142
Closed
seonghobae wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Superseded
This clean successor was opened when #139 appeared stale after protected main advanced. Before this branch could become the canonical replacement, another source writer refreshed #139 itself onto current protected main
f4cae6d83eadb00019d2962a650c55c59a3349ae; fresh compare evidence shows #139 is nowbehind_by: 0and contains the same four-file calendar slice.Keeping two equivalent writer lanes would duplicate checks/reviews and violate the single-writer queue discipline, so this PR is closed without merge. Continue the capability on #139.
Refs #129, #139 and #21.