fix(backend): reconcile fail-closed Rust loader handling - #831
fix(backend): reconcile fail-closed Rust loader handling#831seonghobae wants to merge 8 commits into
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 11 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head6d99e29d6079f9c7e16187364e57046ab66e1586. -
Head SHA:
6d99e29d6079f9c7e16187364e57046ab66e1586 -
Workflow run: 31765769047
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file: backend.py"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file: backend.py"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Evidence --> S2["Test: test_backend_import_failure_contract.py"]
S2 --> I2["regression suite"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Test: test_backend_import_failure_contract.py"]
R2 --> V2["targeted test run"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file: backend.py"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file: backend.py"]
R2 --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (2 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test (2 files)"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
|
|
Fresh RCA on exact head |
|
@opencode-agent review the current exact PR head after the release-note commit. Preserve all protected-main gates; do not merge or update the branch. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
Pull request was converted to draft
Pull request was converted to draft
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current heada52de8a80acc67409a5cab2d0d4c998239798eaf. -
Head SHA:
a52de8a80acc67409a5cab2d0d4c998239798eaf -
Workflow run: 31840983682
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
Evidence --> S2["Changed file: backend.py"]
S2 --> I2["repository behavior"]
I2 --> R2["Review risk: Changed file: backend.py"]
R2 --> V2["required checks"]
Evidence --> S3["Test (2 files)"]
S3 --> I3["regression suite"]
I3 --> R3["Review risk: Test (2 files)"]
R3 --> V3["targeted test run"]
|
@opencode-agent Please re-review exact unchanged head |
|
Superseded without merge by #951 after same-scope reconciliation. #951 now contains this lane's package-owned normalization for discoverable-but-unloadable |
1 participant
Scope
Reconcile fail-closed native-loader handling and harden backend/device control validation without changing numerical ownership.
fast_mlsirm._core(ImportErrororOSError) to package-ownedRuntimeError("compiled Rust core is present but could not be imported")while preserving the original loader exception as__cause__.str-subclass backend/device controls before caller-defined conversion or normalization callbacks and before native-core discovery.Test-first lineage
17843d8b4ea6e866ac73a56732a4eb9cda7e4876proves backend/device controls fail before hostile object/strcallbacks and before native-core discovery.8c9713a2e3f1808899b91090fba6f22bd1975a15requires exact built-instrcontrols before package-owned whitespace/case normalization and allowlist validation.80da63a257ab0cdcdcf0fba8f6f6ee76ab2c8dbcrecords the security and standards boundary.a52de8a80acc67409a5cab2d0d4c998239798eafupdates canonical release evidence.Boundaries
No NumPy production fallback, estimator/formula/optimizer/GPU/dependency change, reflected caller exception text, force update, destructive rebase, gate weakening or self-approval.
Exact current state
fb67ced09d8ee00542c05d56374537a9a7239751.a52de8a80acc67409a5cab2d0d4c998239798eaf.CHANGES_REQUESTED. Central run31840983682reported that required coverage evidence did not materialize, notwithstanding the separately successful target check contexts. This is central evidence/control-plane failure rather than source-defect proof, but the formal review remains effective until superseded or legitimately resolved.6d99e29d6079f9c7e16187364e57046ab66e1586is historical.No gate, review or approval is dismissed, weakened or bypassed. Any future source-head movement requires fresh exact-head evidence.
Supersedes the stale integration lane of #824 and advances #626.