Skip to content

feat: land remaining #290–#328 stack features onto main - #374

Merged
seonghobae merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
integrate/stack-290-328-onto-main
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

feat: land remaining #290–#328 stack features onto main#374
seonghobae merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
integrate/stack-290-328-onto-main

Conversation

@seonghobae

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Supersedes / closes chain members

Closes remaining open stack PRs once this merges (or supersedes their content):
#291 #293 #295 #297 #301 #303 #305 #307 #309 #313 #317 #318 #319 #320 #321 #325 #326 #327 #328
(Plus notes for side-base merges that never landed on main: #292 #294 #296 #298 #302 #304 #306 #308 #311.)

Test plan

  • cargo test -p mlsirm-core --lib -- scaling:: (111 passed locally)
  • CI full suite on this PR
  • Confirm GPU/MT symbols remain on main after merge

Integrates the remaining paired-comparison, rating, and inter-rater
agreement features from the seonghobae stack tip (seonghobae-ncohen)
onto current main after #290 squash-landed and intermediate stacked
bases could not cleanly retarget under squash rewrites.

Preserves main GPU/MT NLL path (lib.rs unchanged). Python/Rust parity
bindings and unit/paper tests included.
@seonghobae
seonghobae merged commit b6b171b into main Jul 31, 2026
23 of 24 checks passed
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 4 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 9385765d-6293-4ca6-aa56-6ff33d716726

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 853de10 and 9a9cb35.

📒 Files selected for processing (13)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • crates/fast-mlsirm-py/src/lib.rs
  • crates/mlsirm-core/src/agreement.rs
  • crates/mlsirm-core/src/reliability.rs
  • crates/mlsirm-core/src/scaling.rs
  • python/fast_mlsirm/__init__.py
  • python/fast_mlsirm/reliability.py
  • python/fast_mlsirm/scaling.py
  • python/fast_mlsirm/validation.py
  • tests/test_paper_features.py
  • tests/unit/agreement_tests.rs
  • tests/unit/reliability_tests.rs
  • tests/unit/scaling_tests.rs

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@seonghobae
seonghobae deleted the integrate/stack-290-328-onto-main branch July 31, 2026 12:43
This was referenced Jul 31, 2026
seonghobae added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2026
…adge (#375)

Bump package versions after #374 lands the #290#328 paired-comparison,
rating, and inter-rater APIs on main (with #373 README DeepWiki badge).
Restore the v0.1.1 changelog section that the stack tip tree had overwritten
and document the 0.1.2 feature surface without regressing GPU/MT NLL.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant