docs(product-gap): preserve baseline and add live refresh - #1519
seonghobae wants to merge 145 commits into
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR refreshes the product technical baseline with current repository evidence, updates GAP-03 status, removes obsolete sections, and corrects the Jeon & Rabe-Hesketh publication reference. ChangesDocumentation baseline refresh
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This change refreshes documentation-only product-gap records and does not alter runtime behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Refresh the buyer-facing inventory against the current protected main and live GitHub queue. Remove the unsupported valuation appendix and keep shipped, active, and blocked evidence distinct. Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
884d59e to
4a372a8
Compare
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
@opencode-agent Please review exact current head Verify the point-in-time separation between protected-main capability and active-PR candidates; the 20-open-PR/50-open-issue inventory; package version 0.9.1; closure treatment for #626/#627; the corrected Jeon–Rabe-Hesketh 2016 citation; removal of unsupported valuation/certification and unverifiable literature; and preservation of a bounded, actionable product-gap baseline rather than a duplicate PRD/architecture dump. Return an actual current-head |
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
Signed-off-by: Seongho Bae <me@seonghobae.me>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
2026-09-12 single-writer authority update:
This is additive evidence only, not merge/release authority. No baseline rewrite, force update, no-op retrigger, or gate weakening. |
|
@coderabbitai review Please review exact head |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
head='edbf925b5fe522d4ca0962cbf601d9f96cfaaf25'
base='493326f2de49ea1704da0ded19868ed05d2fe00f'
doc='docs/product-technical-gap-live-refresh-2026-09-12.md'
repo='ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm'
central='ContextualWisdomLab/.github'
printf '%s\n' '== Exact commit and changed-file scope =='
git rev-parse "${head}^{commit}"
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r "$head"
printf '%s\n' '== Historical baseline unchanged from protected product base =='
git diff --quiet "$base" "$head" -- docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md && echo 'UNCHANGED' || echo 'CHANGED'
printf '%s\n' '== Supplement at exact head =='
git show "${head}:${doc}"
printf '%s\n' '== Referenced GitHub identifiers extracted from supplement =='
git show "${head}:${doc}" | rg -o '#[0-9]+|[0-9a-f]{40}|[0-9]{8,}' | sort -u
printf '%s\n' '== Product PR and issue metadata =='
for n in 1717 1815 1816 1819 2040 2051; do
target_repo="$repo"
if [ "$n" = 2040 ] || [ "$n" = 2051 ]; then target_repo="$central"; fi
echo "--- ${target_repo}#${n}"
gh api "repos/${target_repo}/issues/${n}" \
--jq '{number,title,state,pull_request,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,html_url}' || true
done
printf '%s\n' '== Exact commit existence and check-rollup =='
gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${head}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '.check_runs[] | {name,status,conclusion,head_sha,started_at,completed_at,html_url}' || true
printf '%s\n' '== Open inventory counts =='
gh api "search/issues?q=repo:${repo}+is:pr+is:open&per_page=1" --jq '.total_count'
gh api "search/issues?q=repo:${repo}+is:issue+is:open&per_page=1" --jq '.total_count'
printf '%s\n' '== Referenced product PR details and head commits =='
for n in 1717 1815 1816 1819; do
echo "--- ${repo}#${n}"
gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}" \
--jq '{number,state,draft,merged_at,mergeable,head:{ref:.head.ref,sha:.head.sha},base:{ref:.base.ref,sha:.base.sha},html_url}' || true
done
printf '%s\n' '== Referenced central PR details and head commits =='
for n in 2040 2051; do
echo "--- ${central}#${n}"
gh api "repos/${central}/pulls/${n}" \
--jq '{number,state,draft,merged_at,mergeable,head:{ref:.head.ref,sha:.head.sha},base:{ref:.base.ref,sha:.base.sha},html_url}' || true
doneLength of output: 28194 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo='ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm'
central='ContextualWisdomLab/.github'
doc='docs/product-technical-gap-live-refresh-2026-09-12.md'
head='edbf925b5fe522d4ca0962cbf601d9f96cfaaf25'
printf '%s\n' '== Numbered supplement =='
git show "${head}:${doc}" | nl -ba
printf '%s\n' '== Central candidate comparison against documented authority =='
gh api "repos/${central}/compare/cb0872c9a20d5584703dffacca65c096fc034c6c...6706c231ab06a3c91c43fdb5b989cfcd79fff593" \
--jq '{status,ahead_by,behind_by,merge_base_commit:.merge_base_commit.sha}' || true
printf '%s\n' '== `#1815` and `#1819` PR state, reviews, and exact-head checks =='
for n in 1815 1819; do
sha=$(gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}" --jq '.head.sha')
echo "--- ${repo}#${n} state"
gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}" --jq '{draft,mergeable,head:.head.sha,base:.base.sha,state}'
echo "--- reviews"
gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}/reviews?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.[] | {user:.user.login,state,commit_id,submitted_at}]' || true
echo "--- check summary for ${sha}"
gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | {name,status,conclusion}]' || true
done
printf '%s\n' '== `#1817`, `#1603`, and `#1694` state =='
for n in 1817 1603 1694; do
gh api "repos/${repo}/issues/${n}" \
--jq '{number,state,title,closed_at,html_url}' || true
done
printf '%s\n' '== Release and protected branch heads =='
gh api "repos/${repo}/releases/tags/v0.9.1" \
--jq '{tag_name,published_at,target_commitish}' || true
gh api "repos/${repo}/git/ref/heads/main" --jq '.object.sha' || true
gh api "repos/${central}/git/ref/heads/main" --jq '.object.sha' || trueLength of output: 19377
The commit adds only
The protected branch heads, You are interacting with an AI system. |
|
CodeRabbit exact-head review follow-up for predecessor
No predecessor checks/reviews transfer to |
|
@coderabbitai review Please review exact current head |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo='ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm'
central='ContextualWisdomLab/.github'
head='0068707ebec9c90fdfde7fc15ba017eb394cb2dc'
base='493326f2de49ea1704da0ded19868ed05d2fe00f'
baseline='docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md'
echo '== Exact commit and effective file diff =='
git rev-parse "${head}^{commit}"
git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-status -r "$head"
echo '-- diff from protected base --'
git diff --name-status "$base" "$head"
echo '== Baseline preservation =='
git diff --quiet "$base" "$head" -- "$baseline" && echo 'UNCHANGED' || echo 'CHANGED'
echo '== Changed supplement, numbered =='
changed_docs=$(git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only -r "$head" -- 'docs/*.md')
for doc in $changed_docs; do
echo "--- $doc"
git show "${head}:${doc}" | nl -ba
done
echo '== PR `#1815` current metadata and exact head =='
gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/1815" \
--jq '{number,state,draft,merged_at,mergeable,head:{sha:.head.sha,ref:.head.ref},base:{sha:.base.sha,ref:.base.ref},updated_at}'
echo '== `#1603` and `#1694` metadata, branch heads, and ADR files =='
for n in 1603 1694; do
pr=$(gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}")
sha=$(jq -r '.head.sha' <<<"$pr")
echo "--- ${repo}#${n}"
jq '{number,state,draft,merged_at,head:{sha:.head.sha,ref:.head.ref},base:{sha:.base.sha,ref:.base.ref}}' <<<"$pr"
echo "--- matching ADR paths at ${sha}"
gh api "repos/${repo}/git/trees/${sha}?recursive=1" --paginate \
--jq '.tree[] | select(.path == "docs/adr/0030-governed-rater-published-language.md" or .path == "docs/adr/0031-rust-registry-distribution-boundary.md") | {path,sha}' || true
echo "--- ADR diff against PR base"
base_sha=$(jq -r '.base.sha' <<<"$pr")
git diff --name-status "$base_sha" "$sha" -- docs/adr/0030-governed-rater-published-language.md docs/adr/0031-rust-registry-distribution-boundary.md || true
done
echo '== Central `#2040` metadata, exact head, and documented comparison =='
gh api "repos/${central}/pulls/2040" \
--jq '{number,state,draft,merged_at,mergeable,head:{sha:.head.sha,ref:.head.ref},base:{sha:.base.sha,ref:.base.ref},updated_at}'
gh api "repos/${central}/compare/cb0872c9a20d5584703dffacca65c096fc034c6c...3b2de64c2c4c95c56d2f5099a480a0825304d038" \
--jq '{status,ahead_by,behind_by,merge_base_commit:.merge_base_commit.sha}'Length of output: 13596 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo='ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm'
central='ContextualWisdomLab/.github'
echo '== Exact supplement correction diff =='
git diff 0068707ebec9c90fdfde7fc15ba017eb394cb2dc^ 0068707ebec9c90fdfde7fc15ba017eb394cb2dc \
-- docs/product-technical-gap-live-refresh-2026-09-12.md
echo '== ADR content at the documented owner heads =='
for pair in \
'acf1891469f2eba456107584f692d4dd6280c1ed:docs/adr/0030-governed-rater-published-language.md' \
'9ba4e018c1ba359fc72e515fef2eb466e17c48b3:docs/adr/0031-rust-registry-distribution-boundary.md'
do
sha=${pair%%:*}
path=${pair#*:}
echo "--- ${sha}:${path}"
git show "${sha}:${path}" | sed -n '1,180p'
done
echo '== `#1815` and `#1819` exact-head reviews and checks =='
for n in 1815 1819; do
sha=$(gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}" --jq '.head.sha')
echo "--- ${repo}#${n} reviews for ${sha}"
gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}/reviews?per_page=100" \
--jq --arg sha "$sha" '[.[] | select(.commit_id == $sha) | {user:.user.login,state,commit_id,submitted_at}]'
echo "--- check runs for ${sha}"
gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | {name,status,conclusion,html_url}]'
done
echo '== Central `#2040` exact-head checks and cited workflow jobs =='
central_sha='3b2de64c2c4c95c56d2f5099a480a0825304d038'
gh api "repos/${central}/commits/${central_sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" \
--jq '[.check_runs[] | {name,status,conclusion,html_url}]'
for run in 103362319731 103362317835 103362504390; do
echo "--- workflow job ${run}"
gh api "repos/${central}/actions/jobs/${run}" \
--jq '{id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,started_at,completed_at,html_url,steps:[.steps[] | {name,status,conclusion}]}'
doneLength of output: 24596 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo='ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm'
central='ContextualWisdomLab/.github'
echo '== `#1815` and `#1819` current-head reviews and check runs =='
for n in 1815 1819; do
sha=$(gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}" --jq '.head.sha')
echo "--- ${repo}#${n}; ${sha}; reviews"
gh api "repos/${repo}/pulls/${n}/reviews?per_page=100" |
jq --arg sha "$sha" '[.[] | select(.commit_id == $sha) | {user:.user.login,state,commit_id,submitted_at}]'
echo "--- checks"
gh api "repos/${repo}/commits/${sha}/check-runs?per_page=100" |
jq '[.check_runs[] | {name,status,conclusion,html_url}]'
done
echo '== Central `#2040` cited jobs =='
for job in 103362319731 103362317835 103362504390; do
gh api "repos/${central}/actions/jobs/${job}" |
jq '{id,name,status,conclusion,head_sha,started_at,completed_at,html_url}'
done
echo '== Central `#2040` check runs for documented exact head =='
gh api "repos/${central}/commits/3b2de64c2c4c95c56d2f5099a480a0825304d038/check-runs?per_page=100" |
jq '[.check_runs[] | {name,status,conclusion,html_url}]'Length of output: 28891 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
gh api 'repos/ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm/pulls/1519' \
--jq '{number,state,draft,head_sha:.head.sha,base_sha:.base.sha,updated_at}'Length of output: 497
I verified these points:
The supplement does not promote Draft work, mutable PR heads, or central-owner proposals to shipped status. You are interacting with an AI system. |
|
Advanced the existing product-gap single writer by ordinary contents update to exact head Scope from predecessor The refresh records central |
|
Final single-writer state after Ready admission evidence changed: exact head Fresh product runs are CodeQL |
|
Fresh repository-owned generation on unchanged |
Final single-writer Gap refreshExact head: The existing 2026-09-12 additive supplement now binds central #2040's replay-guard RED → GREEN, the corrective exact tree, and verified #2051/#2056 semantic carryover. The historical baseline remains byte-identical at blob Fresh compare from Fresh exact-head runs: CI 34685406719 is path-classified skipped; Security 34685406704, Semgrep 34685406723, required CodeQL 34685406768, and repository CodeQL 34685406675 are queued. No queued result is promoted to GREEN. |
|
Gap single-writer refresh on exact head
Fresh exact-head runs: CI |
|
Updated the existing Gap single-writer with the final central owner evidence.
Fresh product exact-head runs: Security #1519 remains Draft / Proposed. No approval, Ready retrigger, auto-merge, bypass, manual rerun, no-op/source-neutral commit, force update, destructive rebase, or predecessor evidence transfer was used. |
|
Unchanged-head hosted follow-up for |
|
Protected-main reconciliation
|
Fresh exact-head hosted evidence — conflict repair is GREENRevalidated the non-force reconciliation commit
The exact head remains the ordinary two-parent merge of prior branch head No earlier review evidence is promoted to this head. Current-head independent approval remains absent, so this is exact-head check evidence only and does not open the merge gate. |
Protected-main advance reconciliation — second exact-head generationWhile the preceding Ordinary non-force two-parent commit
Before publication, exact compares proved:
Post-publication the PR reports exact head The previous |
|
Fresh exact-head completion for |
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode could not approve from deterministic current-head evidence because GitHub Checks have failed.
Findings
1. HIGH Current-head GitHub Checks - Fix failed required checks before approval
- Problem: Failed same-head checks remain for
d7927a7558c25569c9fe488f95ce6a5f943a595b. - Root cause: The model-unavailable evidence fallback is allowed only when peer GitHub Checks are complete and clean.
- Fix: Read and fix the failed check logs below, then rerun the current-head checks.
- Regression test: Keep the model-unavailable fallback gated on an empty failed-check rollup.
Failed checks:
- Required Noema Review/noema-review: FAILURE (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm/actions/runs/34706172132/job/103586753996)
- noema-review check run: failure (https://github.com/ContextualWisdomLab/fast-mlsirm/actions/runs/34706172132/job/103586753996)
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Docs: product-technical-gap-live-refresh-2026-09-04.md (6 files)"]
S1 --> I1["operator or user guidance"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Docs: product-technical-gap-live-refresh-2026-09-04.md (6 files)"]
R1 --> V1["docs review"]
OpenCode Review Overview
|
1 participant
Single-writer scope
This PR remains the sole product/technical-gap writer.
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdis preserved rather than rewritten; live movement is recorded as dated additive supplements so historical PRD/TRD/UML, scientific, release, accessibility and traceability evidence remains auditable.Current exact authority — 2026-09-12
main@493326f2de49ea1704da0ded19868ed05d2fe00f;e3899e499c53c403eff0469543c1c60fe47bb5f3;docs/product-technical-gap-live-refresh-*.mdsupplements only, 450 additions / 0 deletions;docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdremains outside the effective diff;v0.9.1(2026-08-26).The current head is the ordinary-forward repair of the latest review finding plus the live authority refresh. #1603/#1694 ADR identities were rechecked against their actual branches rather than inferred from PR titles: #1603 owns
ADR-0030atacf1891469f2eba456107584f692d4dd6280c1ed, and #1694 ownsADR-0031at9ba4e018c1ba359fc72e515fef2eb466e17c48b3.Current exact-head verification
The current repository-owned generation is terminal on this unchanged head:
34687016800: GREEN;34687016780: GREEN;34687016830: GREEN;34687016817: GREEN;34687016799: path-classified skipped and not promoted to GREEN evidence.The one-file product-gap refresh records central owner repair only. ContextualWisdomLab/.github#2040 advanced by ordinary force=false two-parent reconciliation to exact head
85522306949bada2b5939608dc911f6374125f1b, treefe8ca79a4fd410e68eb790258820a511fa6cdc70, 150 ahead / 0 behind protected centralmain@fb17ef556f94f673234aa557254ae52779e9a7b0. It preserves the CodeQL/SARIF proposal together with main's merged JavaScript materializer and queue-history contracts. Exact-tree evidence is focused72 passed, repository3133 passed / 1 skipped / 36 subtests, and statement, branch, and public-doc coverage at 100%; fresh hosted runs remain queued and therefore non-authorizing.No predecessor review or Check is promoted across either head movement. #1519 has no qualifying independent approval on
e3899e49...; the submitted APPROVED review and CHANGES_REQUESTED reviews in history are bound to older heads. Required OpenCode/Noema owner-path acceptance therefore remains unresolved, and no no-op head movement, synthetic status, provider hard-code, or leaf implementation is authorized.Containment and landing rule
The PR is Ready / Proposed solely for exact-head independent review admission. The central owner path has materially advanced at
.github#2040@85522306949bada2b5939608dc911f6374125f1b; qualifying current-head approval remains a merge gate, not a Ready prerequisite.Normal landing requires this unchanged exact head, every applicable current gate terminal GREEN, zero valid unresolved findings, and a qualifying independent current-head approval. No self-approval, bypass, force update, destructive rebase, gate weakening, skip/xfail success accounting, source-neutral retrigger, predecessor-success transfer, provider/model hard-code, paid fallback, mutable foreign-owner dependency, or stale review inference is accepted as completion.