build(deps): bootstrap hash-locked pip 26.2 - #82
Conversation
Bumps [pip](https://github.com/pypa/pip) from 26.1.2 to 26.2. - [Changelog](https://github.com/pypa/pip/blob/main/NEWS.rst) - [Commits](pypa/pip@26.1.2...26.2) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: pip dependency-version: '26.2' dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough해시 고정 pip 26.2 부트스트랩 파일이 추가되었습니다. 퍼즈 및 보안 CI가 이를 설치하고 버전을 검증합니다. 보안 의존성 잠금과 퍼즈 입력 파일도 갱신되었습니다. Changespip 공급망 및 CI 갱신
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
requirements-security-ci.txt (1)
403-403: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
pip==26.2를 보안 CI 입력에 추가하세요.
requirements-security-ci.in에는pip-audit와cyclonedx-bom만 선언되어 있습니다.security.yml은requirements-security-ci.txt만 설치하며, 저장소에pip==26.2선언이 없습니다.pip==26.2와 hash를 입력 파일에 추가한 후 lock file을 재생성하세요.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@requirements-security-ci.txt` at line 403, Declare pip==26.2 with its appropriate hash in requirements-security-ci.in, then regenerate requirements-security-ci.txt so the locked security CI dependencies include that pinned package and hash. Preserve the existing pip-api entry and lock-file format.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@requirements-security-ci.txt`:
- Line 403: Declare pip==26.2 with its appropriate hash in
requirements-security-ci.in, then regenerate requirements-security-ci.txt so the
locked security CI dependencies include that pinned package and hash. Preserve
the existing pip-api entry and lock-file format.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: efefe98b-5e62-45c3-b416-4bcc0d934bb4
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
fuzz/requirements-atheris.txtrequirements-security-ci.txt
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- fuzz/requirements-atheris.txt
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current headdf888b80a8f7e8f139f5ebd47ed0c9a3efa5180d. -
Head SHA:
df888b80a8f7e8f139f5ebd47ed0c9a3efa5180d -
Workflow run: 30768818491
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
|
Addressed the valid pip-removal finding with a repository-wide bootstrap lock rather than relying on pip as an incidental transitive dependency. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
seonghobae
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/security.yml:
- Around line 67-68: Replace the prefix-based pip checks with exact
importlib.metadata.version("pip") == "26.2" comparisons in the workflow steps at
.github/workflows/security.yml lines 67-68, .github/workflows/fuzz.yml lines
39-40 and 70-71, and the metadata test at
tests/test_repository_security_metadata.py lines 45-46.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: be06a2c9-6150-4eeb-943b-9be096ff8069
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/workflows/fuzz.yml.github/workflows/security.ymlfuzz/requirements-atheris.inrequirements-pip-bootstrap.inrequirements-pip-bootstrap.txtrequirements-security-ci.intests/test_repository_security_metadata.py
|
Addressed the current-head CodeRabbit finding: every Security/Fuzz bootstrap now uses an exact |
|
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
Pull request was converted to draft
|
Temporarily Draft to preserve the security base. This branch rewrites |
|
@dependabot rebase Rebase onto the integrated security/Atheris prerequisite base |
|
Looks like this PR has been edited by someone other than Dependabot. That means Dependabot can't rebase it - sorry! If you're happy for Dependabot to recreate it from scratch, overwriting any edits, you can request |
|
@opencode-agent @cwl-noema-review Review exact current contributor head |
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
1 participant
Summary
Upgrade the repository-wide installer bootstrap to hash-locked
pip==26.2without treating pip as an incidental dependency of security or fuzz tooling, while preserving PR #96's provider-transport, response-trust, exact-head checkout, and portable Atheris boundaries.Changes
requirements-pip-bootstrap.inand a two-artifact SHA-256 lock forpip==26.2.atheris==3.0.0below Python 3.13 andatheris==3.1.0on Python 3.13+.Integration order
PR #96 supersedes closed-unmerged PR #76 and remains this PR's stacked base. This PR must remain Draft and must not merge before #96 reaches protected
main.The branch was refreshed on 2026-08-12 with a normal two-parent merge of the accepted stable PR #96 head. Conflicts were limited to
fuzz/requirements-atheris.inandfuzz/requirements-atheris.txt; the reconciliation retained #96's interpreter-specific Atheris markers and moved pip exclusively to the repository-wide bootstrap lock. The resulting unique diff against #96 is nine intended workflow, lock, and contract-test files.If #96 moves again, this evidence becomes historical and this branch must be refreshed once more. No predecessor-head check, review, or approval transfers.
Exact identity
9341bac45484bdc53b2f8813baac85ee118b176b3703d0da9823b8258a0be94f1801aa5d61bfad9fmaintip independently observed through fix(security): pin provider egress and repair the Atheris lock #96:6841b71935e0b7cb98fb52bcb4709cc5100c8d87d44fcd37bcfa59961286f2b2fec3135e1146c781Verification
Local supporting proof:
Every hosted workflow below explicitly fetched and checked out exact contributor head
9341bac45484bdc53b2f8813baac85ee118b176bwith checkout credentials disabled:31550791259, job93972866638: success; 567 passed, 3,667 statements and 934 branches at 100%, and public docstrings at 100%.31550791367: success.93972867017installed and exactly verified pip 26.2, built the package, found no known vulnerabilities, and published CycloneDX SBOM artifact9124188864with archive digestsha256:282d8772b1d9f75e5f73159bf3fb2fbfc6219646751d4ece5019367749253e5b.93972867118completed successfully and uploaded its exact-head analysis.31550791398: success.93972866942installed and exactly verified pip 26.2 and passed 8 property tests.93972867039installed and exactly verified pip 26.2, then completed all four bounded targets with 8,086,886 / 9,922,187 / 672,380 / 3,403 runs. Crash-artifact upload was skipped only because no crash file existed.The earlier OpenCode
CHANGES_REQUESTEDreview applies only to predecessordf888b80a8f7e8f139f5ebd47ed0c9a3efa5180dand is not current-head evidence.Acceptance
This PR remains Draft until #96 reaches protected
main, the branch is reconciled again if that upstream identity changes, every required exact-head security/review gate is complete, zero valid findings remain, and a qualifying independent non-author approval applies to the unchanged head. Queued, skipped-required, predecessor-head, stale-base, synthetic-merge, status-only, author-only, absent, failed, or infrastructure-only evidence is not success.Downstream stack
Draft PR #69 is stacked on this exact head at
27432737188ea43a0e81ecd279d66cb16c3a00ab. Relative to #82 it contains only the immutable setup-python 7 workflow update and matching metadata contract; its exact-head Tests, Security, and Fuzz runs succeeded. That evidence is downstream-only and becomes historical if #82 or #96 moves. Merge order remains #96, then a protected-base rebuild/refresh of #82, then a rebuild/refresh of #69.