Skip to content

build(deps): bump coverage from 7.15.0 to 7.15.4 - #701

Merged
seonghobae merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/coverage-7.15.4
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

build(deps): bump coverage from 7.15.0 to 7.15.4#701
seonghobae merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/coverage-7.15.4

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps coverage from 7.15.0 to 7.15.4.

Release notes

Sourced from coverage's releases.

7.15.4

Version 7.15.4 — 2026-08-06

  • Fix: in the HTML report, a source file name containing a double quote (legal on POSIX) wasn’t escaped where it’s dropped into the href of the index and prev/next links, so it could close the attribute early and inject markup. Page URLs are now escaped. Thanks, Rajath Mohare.
  • Fix: the LCOV report wrote file names and other fields into its line-oriented records without neutralizing control characters. A measured file whose name contained a newline (legal on POSIX) could forge extra records, inflating the coverage seen by tools that read the report. Control characters in a field are now replaced. Thanks, Rajath Mohare.
  • Wheels are now provided for Python 3.15.

➡️  PyPI page: coverage 7.15.4. :arrow_right:  To install: python3 -m pip install coverage==7.15.4

7.15.3

Version 7.15.3 — 2026-08-02

  • Fix: the sysmon core is incompatible with dynamic contexts. Previously, the combination would be prevented when read from the coverage.py configuration. But using the context API as pytest-cov does, contexts would be silently dropped. Now a warning is issued, thanks to Jisang Han. Closes issue 2200.
  • A performance improvement in the low-level line number bookkeeping when combining data files, thanks to Kevin Turcios.
  • Performance improvement in HTML reporting by reducing the number of times files have to be parsed, thanks to Kevin Turcios.

➡️  PyPI page: coverage 7.15.3. :arrow_right:  To install: python3 -m pip install coverage==7.15.3

7.15.2

Version 7.15.2 — 2026-07-15

  • Fix: one of the performance improvements in 7.15.1 (pull 2215) dramatically increased memory use during reporting for large projects. Now we use a different approach that is both faster and slimmer than 7.15.0. Fixes issue 2229.

➡️  PyPI page: coverage 7.15.2. :arrow_right:  To install: python3 -m pip install coverage==7.15.2

7.15.1

Version 7.15.1 — 2026-07-12

  • Fix: in the HTML report with show_contexts enabled, a context label containing </script> (for example a parametrized pytest node id) could close the inline <script> element in a file page early, injecting markup. Context labels are now fully escaped. Thanks, Rajath Mohare.
  • A number of performance improvements thanks to Paul Kehrer, in pull requests 2213, 2214, 2215, 2216, 2218, 2220, and 2221.

➡️  PyPI page: coverage 7.15.1. :arrow_right:  To install: python3 -m pip install coverage==7.15.1

Changelog

Sourced from coverage's changelog.

Version 7.15.4 — 2026-08-06

  • Fix: in the HTML report, a source file name containing a double quote (legal on POSIX) wasn't escaped where it's dropped into the href of the index and prev/next links, so it could close the attribute early and inject markup. Page URLs are now escaped. Thanks, Rajath Mohare <pull 2227_>_.

  • Fix: the LCOV report wrote file names and other fields into its line-oriented records without neutralizing control characters. A measured file whose name contained a newline (legal on POSIX) could forge extra records, inflating the coverage seen by tools that read the report. Control characters in a field are now replaced. Thanks, Rajath Mohare <pull 2226_>_.

  • Wheels are now provided for Python 3.15.

.. _pull 2226: coveragepy/coveragepy#2226 .. _pull 2227: coveragepy/coveragepy#2227

.. _changes_7-15-3:

Version 7.15.3 — 2026-08-02

  • Fix: the sysmon core is incompatible with dynamic contexts. Previously, the combination would be prevented when read from the coverage.py configuration. But using the context API as pytest-cov does, contexts would be silently dropped. Now a warning is issued, thanks to Jisang Han <pull 2234_>. Closes issue 2200.

  • A performance improvement in the low-level line number bookkeeping when combining data files, thanks to Kevin Turcios <pull 2239_>_.

  • Performance improvement in HTML reporting by reducing the number of times files have to be parsed, thanks to Kevin Turcios <pull 2240_>_.

.. _issue 2200: coveragepy/coveragepy#2200 .. _pull 2234: coveragepy/coveragepy#2234 .. _pull 2239: coveragepy/coveragepy#2239 .. _pull 2240: coveragepy/coveragepy#2240

.. _changes_7-15-2:

Version 7.15.2 — 2026-07-15

  • Fix: one of the performance improvements in 7.15.1 (pull 2215) dramatically

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 4c0e7ff docs: sample HTML for 7.15.4
  • db4cc32 docs: prep for 7.15.4
  • c33085c style: start gradual move to ruff 0.16
  • 53a0fd5 fix: neutralize control characters in lcov report fields (#2226)
  • b64d53d build: make 3.15 wheels
  • 53792ab build: show the python version for kits
  • f6b03c7 chore: make upgrade_one package=cibuildwheel
  • d9b660a chore: make upgrade
  • b128a31 docs: oops, move this entry to the correct place
  • a7a2c15 fix: escape filename urls in html report href attributes (#2227)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update python code labels Aug 16, 2026
@dependabot
dependabot Bot requested a review from seonghobae as a code owner August 16, 2026 20:25
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update python code labels Aug 16, 2026
@seonghobae
seonghobae enabled auto-merge (squash) August 16, 2026 21:33

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 55bdbfa07d87c9b0e82eef8c72008216cd039e7d.

  • Head SHA: 55bdbfa07d87c9b0e82eef8c72008216cd039e7d

  • Workflow run: 32131995393

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent

opencode-agent Bot commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OpenCode Review Overview

  • Head SHA: 7b3f190fcb802fef84734af205d18ca7d812cac9
  • Workflow run: 32213256148
  • Workflow attempt: 1
  • Gate result: REQUEST_CHANGES (approval step)

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 7b3f190fcb802fef84734af205d18ca7d812cac9.

  • Head SHA: 7b3f190fcb802fef84734af205d18ca7d812cac9

  • Workflow run: 32213256148

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

@opencode-agent
opencode-agent Bot disabled auto-merge August 18, 2026 16:07
Bumps [coverage](https://github.com/coveragepy/coveragepy) from 7.15.0 to 7.15.4.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/coveragepy/coveragepy/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/coveragepy/coveragepy/blob/main/CHANGES.rst)
- [Commits](coveragepy/coveragepy@7.15.0...7.15.4)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: coverage
  dependency-version: 7.15.4
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot
dependabot Bot force-pushed the dependabot/pip/coverage-7.15.4 branch from 55bdbfa to 7b3f190 Compare August 19, 2026 01:40
@seonghobae
seonghobae dismissed opencode-agent[bot]’s stale review August 19, 2026 04:18

Dismissing: mechanical 'coverage-evidence result was failure' rejection from before the atheris/cp314 fix (merged via #746). Not a content objection to this Dependabot version bump.

@seonghobae
seonghobae merged commit b816608 into main Aug 19, 2026
31 checks passed
@seonghobae
seonghobae deleted the dependabot/pip/coverage-7.15.4 branch August 19, 2026 04:18

@opencode-agent opencode-agent Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.

Review outcome

1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence

  • Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head.

  • Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.

  • Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports success with required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence.

  • Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking needs.coverage-evidence.result == success before posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present.

  • Result: REQUEST_CHANGES

  • Reason: coverage-evidence result was failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head 7b3f190fcb802fef84734af205d18ca7d812cac9.

  • Head SHA: 7b3f190fcb802fef84734af205d18ca7d812cac9

  • Workflow run: 32213256148

  • Workflow attempt: 1

Coverage evidence

Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.

Changed-File Evidence Map

flowchart LR
  PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
  Evidence --> S1["Changed file (2 files)"]
  S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
  I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (2 files)"]
  R1 --> V1["required checks"]
Loading

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update python code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant