docs(gap): refresh product-technical baseline (74 repos, live census) - #1116
docs(gap): refresh product-technical baseline (74 repos, live census)#1116seonghobae wants to merge 64 commits into
Conversation
…losed review-gate RCA Base revision moved to develop@749511c3. Open-PR count 130 -> 185 (6 days, +55; only #957 landed). Section 5 adds finding (k2): all sampled PRs pass code gates but the three org-owned required reviews (opencode-review, strix, noema-review) fail closed, blocking every PR. Records observed in-flight central repair (noema call_llm timeout branch) as a do-not-duplicate item, and re-scopes P0 #3 to gate remediation as the single top priority. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoJBAAXwv58S8P4hQBQQAw
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughBandScope의 제품·기술 기준선과 운영 증거 문서를 갱신했습니다. 최신 census, 제품 요구사항, 병합 증거, transport 상태, 영속성 계약, 보안 경계, 품질 및 릴리스 기준을 반영했습니다. ChangesBandScope 기준선 문서
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to The recovery state model currently leaves RecoveryFailed with no documented exit, so a failed restore can dead-end users and encode an incomplete product contract. Merge should wait until the contract defines acknowledgement to NoSource or retry behavior, with regression coverage. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (2 skipped: 2 unsupported.) ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
… progress Iteration-2 status: gates still fail closed. Central .github landed 8 Noema-reliability fixes (#1477-#1504) plus an active "remove fixed LLM response timeout" branch. Local response: staged merge-ready work behind the closed gates — PR #1116 (this baseline) and PR #1117 (temporal probe promoted from cli hack to api integration, 100% coverage locally). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SoJBAAXwv58S8P4hQBQQAw
|
@opencode-agent Become the sole writer for canonical BandScope branch Validate every finding against fresh live evidence before editing. Current verified contradictions on this exact head include:
Keep the baseline a truth source rather than a blocker narrative: distinguish protected shipped truth, current live evidence, accepted/open work, and planned gaps. If correcting the document surfaces a concrete BandScope executable gap already owned by an issue/PR, link its canonical owner; do not implement that code in this docs lane. Run any repository doc/markdown/contract checks that apply plus |
|
Concurrent recount note for the new exact head |
|
@claude Please refresh the two canonical baseline files on exact current head Also reconcile central-review status from fresh protected-central evidence. Keep the existing Rust core-computation ownership, bounded CPU/accelerator boundary, real-audio acceptance, 100% coverage/docstring/edge-case target, Storybook/Figma/screenshot UX contract, security/operability baseline, and APA 7 traceability intact. Update only truthful volatile evidence and directly contradicted status prose. Run the documentation/baseline contract tests and |
| def missing_state_diagram_references( | ||
| content: str, | ||
| required_texts: Sequence[str], | ||
| ) -> list[str]: | ||
| """Require related transitions to coexist in one Mermaid state diagram.""" | ||
| diagrams = mermaid_state_diagrams(content) | ||
| if any(all(required_text in diagram for required_text in required_texts) for diagram in diagrams): | ||
| return [] | ||
| return list(required_texts) |
| transition_path, transition_label = line.split(":", maxsplit=1) | ||
| source_state, target_state = transition_path.split("-->", maxsplit=1) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Mermaid notes crash documentation checks
When a valid state-diagram note contains a colon and arrow, mermaid_transition_statements raises ValueError. Quickcheck aborts instead of evaluating the document.
| transition_path, transition_label = line.split(":", maxsplit=1) | |
| source_state, target_state = transition_path.split("-->", maxsplit=1) | |
| transition_path, transition_label = line.split(":", maxsplit=1) | |
| if "-->" not in transition_path: | |
| continue | |
| source_state, target_state = transition_path.split("-->", maxsplit=1) |
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
Canonical baseline owner
This PR is the single current owner of
docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.mdand its doctoring trace. Branch source and freshly re-fetched GitHub state are authoritative; this PR body is navigation only.Current live delivery evidence
develop@749511c3ad4000090048718f685c6bee6b3d2c25with branch protection enabled.4522d69916bf8503c1714759c4a92caad8d8aea9.incomplete_results=false. The baseline file's dated 194-PR census remains historical capture evidence rather than a live queue-size claim.review:approved; this repository-wide observation is not a substitute for per-head review proof.Current workstream reconciliation
docs/bandscope-product-readiness-baselineon the docs(gap): refresh product-technical baseline (74 repos, live census) #1116 branch; unique bounded-pagination/exact-head queue machinery must survive every later restack. No predecessor checks/reviews transfer.1c4f6d86285c9741f9bb737bf171ee97366ab1c5; its freshly created exact-head checks remain non-passing while queued.developwriters: feat(workspace): name the selected part's first-pass take #1151 has been retargeted onto feat(workspace): name the selected part's first entrance cue #1150. The stacked comparison is currently conflicting (mergeable: false), so feat(workspace): name the selected part's first-pass take #1151 stays open as a repair lane with its unique first-pass simplification behavior/tests/docs explicitly preserved. GraphQL rate limiting prevented a Draft-state transition during this run; the conflict is recorded in the PR body and is not treated as merge-ready evidence.d657b8d17222e23e7acf95c43766016bb3f013fa; feat(workspace): find tonight's first range on the roadmap #1147 is already closed after verified transfer. Its current Windows/macOS/OSV exact-head lanes are queued and manual evidence is skipped, so it is non-passing.Verification and merge gate
Queued, pending, skipped-required, cancelled, failed, neutral, stale, predecessor-head, protected-base, model-only, status-only, self/author, or administrative-bypass evidence is non-passing. Organization-wide hosted-runner/admission diagnosis remains owned by
ContextualWisdomLab/.github#712where applicable; it is not a reason to weaken gates or manufacture rerun evidence.For #1116 itself, do not self-approve or merge on stale/model/protected-base evidence. Merge only after every applicable required exact-head check is terminal-success, all valid findings are resolved, and a qualifying independent non-author approval applies to the same unchanged last-push head.