feat(workspace): name tonight's first swell plan on the map - #1045
feat(workspace): name tonight's first swell plan on the map#1045seonghobae wants to merge 28 commits into
Conversation
Name the earliest corroborated intensity rise so the staying part can grow into the next downbeat. Engine emission requires the same source set, already-audible named vocals or bass, and RMS ≥1.8×. Heuristic topology, accompaniment other, drops, and breakdowns stay unnamed.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough분석 엔진이 확증된 스템 에너지 상승에서 첫 swell 계획을 생성합니다. 프로젝트 계약이 계획과 provenance를 검증합니다. 데스크톱 워크스페이스가 계획을 지역화하고 해당 맵 섹션으로 이동합니다. Changes첫 swell 계획
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~45 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The change adds fail-closed swell guidance and carries it through the workspace without introducing a concrete merge-blocking risk; it is merge-ready after normal checks and review. Suggested reviewers: Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant AudioAnalysis
participant RoleExtractor
participant RehearsalContract
participant Workspace
participant MapRenderer
AudioAnalysis->>RoleExtractor: stem RMS 에너지 전달
RoleExtractor->>RoleExtractor: staying source와 1.8배 상승 검증
RoleExtractor->>RehearsalContract: swellPlan과 swellPlanSource 저장
Workspace->>RehearsalContract: 유효한 프로젝트 역할 읽기
Workspace->>MapRenderer: 대상 sectionIndex로 이동
MapRenderer-->>Workspace: 섹션 표시 또는 탐색 실패 상태
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@opencode-agent Repair PR #1045 on its existing contributor branch only, starting from exact head Exact release-preflight run While verifying the same current source, remove the unreachable |
|
@opencode-agent Please review current exact head |
|
Please run the required OpenCode review for current HEAD 8ea3b6c. The review must produce a current-head verdict; this request is not an approval or bypass. |
|
Please run the required OpenCode review for current HEAD 7d6db4b. The review must produce a current-head verdict; this request is not an approval or bypass. |
|
@opencode-agent Review PR #1045 only at exact current head against the protected develop base. Refetch the head and base before reviewing, then submit a formal current-head APPROVED or CHANGES_REQUESTED verdict. Do not modify source, weaken gates, or manufacture approval/evidence. |
|
@opencode-agent Review PR #1045 only at exact current head 7d6db4b against the protected develop base. Refetch the head and base before reviewing, then submit a formal current-head APPROVED or CHANGES_REQUESTED verdict. Do not modify source, weaken gates, or manufacture approval/evidence. |
|
Exact HEAD 7d6db4b: local analysis verification passed 698 tests, 24 skipped, 100.00% coverage; hosted CI, release, Windows/macOS builds, security, SBOM, and coverage are terminal-success. Remaining required failures are opencode-review (no current-head verdict) and Strix (central provider invalid_tools/provider-unavailable failure). No source finding or gate bypass was applied. |
|
@opencode-agent Repair PR #1045 on its existing contributor branch only. Start from exact current head Three current-head review findings are validated and RED regressions are already on the branch:
Keep the repair narrowly causal. Do not touch unrelated UI/navigation semantics, do not force-push/rebase, do not weaken any gate, and do not resolve unrelated informational threads. Run the focused shared-types provenance test, desktop core swell contract, analysis-engine swell tests including both drum transitions, pinned Ruff lint/format, exact owned 100% analysis-engine coverage where exposed, then canonical quickcheck/full relevant tests. Commit only after RED→GREEN proof and leave exact successor-head evidence. |
|
@opencode-agent Repair only the current-head non-finite RMS fail-closed defect on the existing canonical branch Current exact-source verification confirms unresolved thread RED first: add the smallest realistic regression(s) through the existing public swell/extractor path proving non-finite energy cannot produce a Verification: focused swell/extractor regressions first, pinned Ruff lint+format, exact 100% analysis-engine statement/branch coverage where exposed, then canonical |
|
@opencode-agent Review PR #1045 only at exact current head |
|
@opencode-agent Repair only the reopened runtime-provenance defect on the existing canonical RED first: add/change the smallest resolver/callout provenance regression proving a nonblank, otherwise valid-looking Run focused |
|
@OpenCode Repair the existing canonical branch Hosted RED is now exact and causal: CI run Make the narrow owning-layer fix in Keep the RED regression. Obtain GREEN for the focused regression and full |
|
Exact-head repair handoff after revalidating current The latest commit This PR is the earliest active BandScope owner for this shared cache boundary (it predates #1047 and already introduced the result-schema bump plus the regression), so please finish the repair here rather than in #1047/#1049. Narrow production fix: compute the feature-cache base from a dedicated key payload containing |
|
@opencode-agent Review PR #1045 only at exact current head The previously validated defects have now been repaired on this canonical branch: non-finite swell energy fails closed; drum entrance/exit participates in raw source continuity; persisted and runtime swell provenance is paired; section-local role objects are isolated; the feature/stem cache is independently keyed by Independently review the complete current diff, especially the feature-cache compatibility path, swell source/energy continuity, shared/Rust/runtime provenance parity, payload typing, buyer-visible navigation/state behavior, and all addressed review findings. Publish a formal current-head APPROVED or CHANGES_REQUESTED verdict through the authorized review path. Do not self-approve for the PR author, weaken gates, force-push, create a competing PR, or treat skipped/neutral/predecessor evidence as success. |
|
Re-requesting review for current HEAD 0b03fb7 after aligning swell-plan validation across shared-types, desktop, and native persistence contracts. |
Summary
Name tonight's first swell plan on the mounted rehearsal map so the staying part can grow into the next downbeat.
A swell is distinct from a drop (#1040): the source set stays, the landing is already active, and named vocals or bass RMS grows by at least 1.8× after an already-audible previous section. Accompaniment
othernever owns. Heuristic topology stays unnamed.Open moves to the matching rendered map section. Customer-facing copy names the next action. Inherited, accessor-backed, or Proxy-substituted runtime metadata remains guidance-only.
Test plan
Summary by CodeRabbit
새 기능
개선
Exact-head verification
Security Notes