docs(gap): refresh protected-main and eleven-PR queue

[seonghobae]

Summary

• bind protected-main evidence to b03cc378
• replace the stale three-PR inventory with the live six-PR queue (feat(psychometric): restore Driver p.16 TIPREDVARstd v/v=1 on main #272 and feat(event): bounded Allen/CHRONOS interval consistency (#170) #279-fix(adr): enforce unique decision identities #283)
• record exact fetched heads, draft state, current gate classifications, and 11 open product issues
• separate protected topic/event/psychometric behavior from active branch candidates

Verification

• uv run python scripts/validate_documentation.py
• uv run pytest -q tests/quality/test_validate_documentation.py (24 passed, 11 subtests)
• git diff --check

Claim boundary

This time-stamped branch snapshot is not protected-main delivery. Independent approval and exact-head required checks remain required.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 문서

  • TEPP 운영자 갭 레지스터의 2026년 8월 28일 스냅샷을 최신 상태로 갱신했습니다.
  • 활성 전달 큐, PR·이슈 현황, 우선순위 및 전달 순서를 업데이트했습니다.
  • 제품 완성 이슈와 주요 갭 항목의 최신 증거, 성숙도 및 전달 상태를 반영했습니다.
  • 스냅샷 헤드 증거와 실시간 조회 시각 표기를 일관되게 정리했습니다.

• 품질 개선

  • 문서 검증에서 실시간 스냅샷 증거와 일치하는 시각을 확인합니다.
  • 누락되거나 오래된 증거 표기를 자동으로 감지합니다.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c27f9d08-c0a8-4a74-a479-85e248faba88

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

2026-08-28 운영 갭 기준선 스냅샷을 갱신했습니다. 보호된 main SHA, PR·이슈 현황, 전달 큐, PR 증거, 갭 상태, 제품 완성 이슈와 우선순위를 반영했습니다. 검증 규칙과 테스트는 Snapshot head evidence 및 fetched-live 증거 기준을 사용합니다. 테스트 저장소 복사에서 .codegraph 디렉터리를 제외합니다.

Changes

제품 기술 갭 기준선

Layer / File(s)	Summary
스냅샷 및 전달 큐 갱신 docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md	스냅샷 시각, 보호된 main SHA, 활성 PR·이슈 현황, PR 증거, 갭 상태와 전달 우선순위를 갱신했습니다.
스냅샷 증거 검증 및 회귀 테스트 scripts/validate_documentation.py, tests/quality/test_product_technical_gap_baseline.py	검증기가 snapshot stamp와 fetched-live timestamp의 일치를 확인합니다. 검증 표기는 Snapshot head evidence를 사용합니다. 누락되거나 오래된 fetched-live 증거를 검증하는 테스트를 추가했습니다.

테스트 저장소 계약

Layer / File(s)	Summary
테스트 저장소 복사 제외 규칙 tests/quality/test_check_workspace_contract.py	copy_repository가 테스트용 저장소를 복사할 때 .codegraph 디렉터리를 제외합니다.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to ca538

The PR refreshes the repository baseline, but it currently omits required scientific acceptance evidence, contains conflicting candidate-K ownership details, and may allow unrelated fetched text to satisfy validation. These issues can mislead operators or let an invalid baseline pass, so the changes should be corrected before merge.

Suggested reviewers: cursoragent

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 11 functions across 3 files. (1 skipped: 1…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	제목은 보호된 main의 gap baseline 문서와 PR 큐를 갱신한 주요 변경을 정확히 설명합니다. 간결하고 구체적입니다.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 11 functions across 3 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/refresh-gap-baseline-20260828

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[devin-ai-integration]

Devin Review found 4 new potential issues.

[devin-ai-integration]

🟡 Merged capabilities remain classified as unshipped

After protected main advanced to 6444a810, the register still binds authority to b03cc378. It misclassifies landed interval work as unmerged.

Prompt for agents

Refresh docs/product-technical-gap-baseline.md against the protected-main commit incorporated by this branch, 6444a810a386513ca97d4ef38bc303757c6bf6bd. Re-fetch the live PR and issue queue, remove or reclassify work now present on protected main, update every affected protected-main/gap/delivery-sequence statement and head, and update the snapshot timestamp and fetched-live evidence together. Add validation coverage if practical so merging a newer protected-main lineage cannot leave the canonical baseline bound to an older SHA.

---

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

[devin-ai-integration]

📝 Info: Timestamp evidence remains unambiguous

SNAPSHOT_FETCH_STAMP accepts both canonical phrases and rejects mismatched duplicate timestamps. Incidental prose cannot satisfy the line-anchored pattern.

---

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

[devin-ai-integration]

📝 Info: Self-referential head uses a stable proxy

The register cannot embed its own final commit SHA. Using PR #281's publication parent avoids an impossible self-reference while preserving exact heads elsewhere.

---

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

[devin-ai-integration]

📝 Info: Generated metadata exclusion is safe

Ignoring .codegraph only shrinks the disposable test copy. Workspace validation does not consume that generated metadata.

---

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.