Repository navigation
feat(estimation): authorize the ADR 0200 anchor method — weights activate #590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -22,9 +22,15 @@ | |
| from lineageweave.lineage_persistence import lineage_edge_specs | ||
| from lineageweave.models import Edge, Record | ||
|
|
||
| # ADR 0145 rejected the unanchored estimator. A future accepted ADR must add | ||
| # its independently validated method code here before persisted weights can run. | ||
| _SUPPORTED_ANCHOR_METHOD_CODES: frozenset[str] = frozenset() | ||
| # Accepted ADR 0200 (points 2-3) authorizes exactly one anchor method: | ||
| # expected-information estimates honestly labeled as validated by the | ||
| # channels' internal response structure only, pending the TEPP | ||
| # criterion-validity gate. When that gate exists, a set that fails it is | ||
| # retired and this stays the only place an anchor method is ever added | ||
| # -- ADR-first, per ADR 0145's original condition. | ||
| _SUPPORTED_ANCHOR_METHOD_CODES: frozenset[str] = frozenset( | ||
| {"unanchored_internal_structure"} | ||
| ) | ||
|
Comment on lines
+31
to
+33
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 📝 Info: Authorized anchor code matches estimation scripts The newly authorized Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
Comment on lines
+25
to
+33
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win 허용 상태 변경에 맞게 상태 메시지와 설명을 갱신해야 합니다.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def _occurred_at(value: datetime) -> datetime: | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.