Skip to content

fix: require credible planned-facility project evidence - #512

Merged
seonghobae merged 4 commits into
feat/board-source-detail-state-filterfrom
codex/planned-facility-confidence
Aug 23, 2026
Merged

fix: require credible planned-facility project evidence#512
seonghobae merged 4 commits into
feat/board-source-detail-state-filterfrom
codex/planned-facility-confidence

Conversation

@seonghobae

@seonghobae seonghobae commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Result

ADR 0142 planned-facility relationships now require the corroborating project mention to meet the existing PROJECT_MENTION_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD. A low-confidence project extraction can no longer admit a high-confidence lw_plans_to_operate relationship.

Minimal fix

  • reuse the existing 0.7 project-mention threshold in the shared admission helper;
  • add one regression for a 0.4 matching project mention;
  • keep unrelated semantic relationships and low-confidence project mentions themselves unchanged.

Exact stack evidence

  • base feat: wire remaining ADR 0133-0137 surfaces into the workspace #490: 037cfe118dddb7dca1c37914612917d480473ce3
  • head: 0e8f27151b25a7b4f221832b8bdb285e2855e1ab
  • full planned-facility parent partition before final docs-only composition: 109 passed, 1 skipped
  • final-head planned-facility regression partition: 12 passed, 48 deselected
  • final-parent post-summary/public-docstring partition before the docs-only composition: 60 passed, 1 skipped
  • exact-head WorkspaceNav partition: 3 passed; frontend lint and static Storybook build passed
  • compileall and diff hygiene passed

Follow-up to #509. This is stacked evidence, not protected-main delivery. Independent exact-head review is required; no self-approval, force-push, or bypass.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 16b0b896-e415-45ff-bd06-74893935d4aa

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

…ilter' into codex/planned-facility-confidence

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

Open in Devin Review

@seonghobae
seonghobae merged commit 2ff02bb into feat/board-source-detail-state-filter Aug 23, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant