QLight #1363
Merged
QLight #1363
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t handlers and the configuration/initialization logic
…rotocol manager shutdown
…ivate transactions which are not referenced in public chain data
…vate data notifications remain on the P2P connection)
…he qlight clients
use pointer embedding, error on unexpected msg types, no-op tx broadcast loop
error on unexpected msg types, remove tx fetcher
remove un-initialised and unstarted downloader, add TODOs to note additional testing/checking
remove unused handlers
…2P checks which ensure that the P2P node is in the raft cluster
remove unnecessary start/stop code for a qlight client
…andle the end of sync block broadcast from the client
… side, reintroduce raft peer checks
…t, token validation on qlight server (if multitenancy is enabled)
…vate block transfer code
this is no longer needed as we are now pushing private block data directly to clients using the qlite p2p protocol instead of the client requesting private block data using the RPC API
Fields were converted to strings, transported, and then converted back to byte slices etc.
…e (they are overwritten when private block data arrives)
…onnects to another qlight server
…auth-token-update qlight: allow the client token to be updated in a running process
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
baptiste-b-pegasys
previously approved these changes
Apr 5, 2022
antonydenyer
previously approved these changes
Apr 5, 2022
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
antonydenyer
dismissed stale reviews from baptiste-b-pegasys and themself
via
2777cfd
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: baptiste-b-pegasys <[email protected]>
baptiste-b-pegasys
previously approved these changes
Apr 6, 2022
rolandtyler
removed
the
doc-change-required
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please see the docs PR below for details about the new feature.
Related PRs: