Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better logging of cache config. #223

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

Better logging of cache config. #223

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

ggreer
Copy link
Contributor

@ggreer ggreer commented Sep 9, 2024

We don't want to try logging the functions on this struct, just config settings.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the CI workflow to ensure accurate reporting of test results.
  • New Features

    • Enhanced logging for cache configuration, providing detailed insights into individual parameters for better issue diagnosis.

@ggreer ggreer requested a review from jirwin as a code owner September 9, 2024 21:05
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the CI workflow and logging functionality within the codebase. In the CI configuration, the command for running Go tests is modified to improve error handling by incorporating set -o pipefail. Additionally, the logging in the NewGoCache function is refined to log cache configuration parameters individually, offering more detailed output for diagnostics.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yaml Updated the Go test command to include set -o pipefail for improved error handling in CI.
pkg/uhttp/gocache.go Enhanced logging in NewGoCache to log cache configuration fields separately for better clarity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant CI
    participant GoTests
    participant Logger

    CI->>GoTests: Run tests with command
    GoTests->>Logger: Log test results
    Logger-->>GoTests: Return log output
    GoTests-->>CI: Return test status
Loading

🐇 "In the CI, we make it right,
With tests that fail, we see the light.
Logs now shine, each field in view,
A clearer path for us to pursue.
Hopping along, we celebrate,
With changes that elevate!" 🥕

Tip

New review model

We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.


New features

Walkthrough comment now includes:

  • Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.

Notes:

  • Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcf4ea6 and 947fc37.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
  • pkg/uhttp/gocache.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
pkg/uhttp/gocache.go (1)
Learnt from: ggreer
PR: ConductorOne/baton-sdk#194
File: pkg/uhttp/gocache.go:125-132
Timestamp: 2024-07-30T19:21:37.891Z
Learning: Errors when clearing the cache in the `GoCache` struct are logged later in the process, so additional logging in the `Clear` method is unnecessary and would cause log spam.
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (1)

33-33: LGTM!

The addition of set -o pipefail is a best practice that improves error handling in the CI pipeline. If any command in the pipeline fails, the entire pipeline will return a failure status, preventing the workflow from incorrectly reporting success.

pkg/uhttp/gocache.go (1)

40-50: LGTM!

The refined logging in the NewGoCache function provides a more detailed and structured log output by logging each cache configuration parameter individually. This change improves the clarity and granularity of the logging, making it easier to diagnose issues related to cache configuration.

We don't want to try logging the functions on this struct, just config settings.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 947fc37 and bf77edf.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/uhttp/gocache.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pkg/uhttp/gocache.go

@ggreer ggreer merged commit 24fede4 into main Sep 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@ggreer ggreer deleted the ggreer/cache-config-log branch September 9, 2024 22:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant