Skip to content

Conversation

@ajgajg1134
Copy link
Member

Check one:

  • Semantic Change: something about the meaning of the text is different
  • Non-semantic Change: Spelling, grammar, or formatting changes.

Summary of change(s):

(See title)

bylaws.tex Outdated
\bsubsection{Housing Points}
All members may notify the evaluations director before the end of the academic year that they would like to receive two housing points for use in the next academic year.
\\* \\*
All votes during the Housing Evaluation Process must be Closed Ballot, Three Tiered Vote as defined in \ref{Three Tiered}.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be removed

@liam-middlebrook
Copy link
Member

Line 252 needs to be re-worded away from the text 'The first process, known as the Housing Evaluation,'

@liam-middlebrook
Copy link
Member

@ajgajg1134 Can you fix the commit with what I mentioned above?

@ajgajg1134
Copy link
Member Author

@liam-middlebrook Should be fixed, This whole section should likely be re-written to improve readability and clarity, but I believe that's beyond the scope of this PR (and my capabilities without some help)

@liam-middlebrook
Copy link
Member

LGTM :shipit:

In the future we should strictly adhere to posting a publicly viewable diff before an amendment comes to vote.

@liam-middlebrook liam-middlebrook merged commit 2fdad29 into ComputerScienceHouse:master Aug 2, 2016
liam-middlebrook added a commit to ComputerScienceHouse/conditional that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants