-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove warning from kubelet rule #11243
Conversation
ComplianceAsCode#10464 did a major refactor of the kubelet rules to move them from running as "Platform" checkType to "Node". This rule was missed to remove the `warnings` flag, as this causes CO to consider the rule as a Platform checkType.
Hi @montaguethomas. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
that's a good catch, thanks for fixing it! |
/ok-to-test |
/test |
@Vincent056: The
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test e2e-aws-ocp4-high |
@montaguethomas: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@montaguethomas Hi, thanks for the patch. Could you rebase on top of latest master? |
/lgtm |
Code Climate has analyzed commit 5b7260e and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 58.5% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
verification passed.
|
Description:
#10464 did a major refactor of the kubelet rules to move them from running as "Platform" checkType to "Node". This rule was missed to remove the
warnings
flag, as this causes CO to consider the rule as a Platform checkType.CO Rule parsing logic:
Rationale:
While trying to tailor out the rule in Compliance Operator, it's impossible to do so as the rule is run as a Node scan but is imported as a Platform checkType.