You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
steve21124
changed the title
Can it be faster than FastEasyMapping?
Can it be faster than FastEasyMapping? MJExtension take 15 seconds and FastEasyMapping take 8 seconds
Sep 8, 2015
- `String to Data` case
- `AttributedString to String` case
Remove unnecessary ivar of cache class.
Boost large properties with small amount dictionary. #197
- `String to Data` case
- `AttributedString to String` case
Remove unnecessary ivar of cache class.
Boost large properties with small amount dictionary. #197
using current MJExtension example. it take about 15 seconds to process 100 rows of json data. Using FastEasyMapping, it only take about 8 seconds. I am looking for solution which will take about 4 seconds.
https://gist.github.com/steve21124/0cd62b06047d7a98a6ce
and this the json data
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zpxjl5wsjfpe2sm/JSONData.json.zip?dl=0
do you know possible solution?
thanks for the great library
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: