Skip to content

adr: ADR-0069 rev1 内容哈希登记(W4-C4 .github#223,配套 archive#5) - #81

Merged
randypanding merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
w4c4-adr0069-index
Aug 21, 2026
Merged

adr: ADR-0069 rev1 内容哈希登记(W4-C4 .github#223,配套 archive#5)#81
randypanding merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
w4c4-adr0069-index

Conversation

@randypanding

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

动机

W4-C4(.github#223)实现落地时发现 ADR-0069 决策 1"样本库不入 agent 可读路径"与 ADR-0020 全仓公开约束冲突。按波次简报偏差协议,在 archive 仓开修订 PR(archive#5,文末追加 rev 1 澄清段,原文字节不动),本 PR 同步登记修订后正本的 content_sha256,维持三向 sha256 闭环(verify_migration (a))。

变更

decisions/INDEX.yaml ADR-0069 条目 content_sha256 → rev 1 内容哈希(4bb3527b…,附注释指向 archive PR#5)。

合并顺序依赖(重要)

本 PR 须先于 archive#5 合并——archive 的 verify_migration 按本仓 main 的 INDEX 实时校验;本 PR 合并后重跑 archive#5 checks 即绿。

测试方法

本地 python scripts/validate.py 通过(INDEX 结构不变,仅哈希值+行尾注释);archive#5 合并后跑 verify_migration 三向闭环。

风险与回滚

两 PR 同卡同批回滚即可复原(哈希回旧值)。

Card: Cloudbird-Software/.github#223

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 21, 2026 19:33
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@randypanding, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 5 minutes

Limit details: You’ve used all 10 included reviews currently available.

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

Wait for the limit to reset, then comment @coderabbitai review or push new commits to the PR.

An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization.

For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d3fbd290-2388-4db3-bc53-3ade98a43a75

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 277fa7c and 50de5c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • decisions/INDEX.yaml

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary by Qodo

ADR-0069 rev1: update content_sha256 in decisions index

📝 Documentation ⚙️ Configuration changes 🕐 Less than 10 minutes

Grey Divider

AI Description

• Update ADR-0069 registry entry to the rev1 content SHA-256
• Preserve the three-way SHA-256 verification loop used by archive verify_migration
• Annotate the change with the linked clarification context (W4-C4 /.github#223, archive PR#5)
Diagram

graph TD
  A["decisions/INDEX.yaml"] --> B(["scripts/validate.py"]) --> C{{"archive repo"}} --> D["ADR-0069 content (rev1)"]
  A --> C
  subgraph Legend
    direction LR
    _f["File"] ~~~ _p(["Script/Check"]) ~~~ _e{{"External repo"}}
  end
Loading
High-Level Assessment

The following are alternative approaches to this PR:

1. CI-generated INDEX hashes
  • ➕ Eliminates manual hash updates and reduces human error
  • ➕ Makes the “three-way SHA-256 loop” self-healing via automation
  • ➖ Requires new CI job and repo permissions/automation design
  • ➖ May complicate the current cross-repo merge ordering constraint
2. Derive hash at verification time from archive source of truth
  • ➕ Avoids duplicating hashes in multiple places
  • ➕ Simplifies INDEX maintenance to paths/metadata only
  • ➖ Weakens the explicit registry guarantee that INDEX pins exact content bytes
  • ➖ Ties verification to archive availability and exact content retrieval semantics

Recommendation: Given the current governance model (INDEX as the canonical pin) and the need to unblock archive verify_migration, the PR’s manual hash registration is the right short-term move. Consider adding a follow-up automation (CI-generated hashes) if this pattern becomes frequent or error-prone.

Files changed (1) +1 / -1

Other (1) +1 / -1
INDEX.yamlUpdate ADR-0069 content_sha256 for rev1 +1/-1

Update ADR-0069 content_sha256 for rev1

• Replaces the ADR-0069 entry’s content_sha256 with the rev1 SHA-256. Adds an inline comment referencing the clarification context and the paired archive PR to maintain traceability for verify_migration.

decisions/INDEX.yaml

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the ADR index entry for ADR-0069 to register the revised (rev1) content SHA-256, keeping the repository’s decision-index hash linkage consistent with the referenced archive revision workflow.

Changes:

  • Updated decisions/INDEX.yaml entry for ADR-0069 to the rev1 content_sha256.
  • Added an inline comment referencing the motivation/context (W4-C4 .github#223) and the paired archive PR (#5).

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@randypanding
randypanding added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 21, 2026
@qodo-code-review

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Grey Divider

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Grey Divider

Tip of the day
💡 Did you know, you can tweak Display preferences with a live preview to see your comment before it ships

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

Grey Divider

Qodo Logo

Merged via the queue into main with commit 2346987 Aug 21, 2026
14 checks passed
@randypanding
randypanding deleted the w4c4-adr0069-index branch August 21, 2026 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants