Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed issues with chi_metro_pier_exposition spyder in parsing date #1134

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lilyhuang-github
Copy link

@lilyhuang-github lilyhuang-github commented Nov 16, 2024

Summary

Issue: #N/A
There's an issue with the chi_metro_pier_exposition spyder where it wasn't parsing the date correctly. It wasn't parsing a date with an apostrophe correctly where the apostrophes indicating the dates been rescheduled and wasn't parsing differing date formats.

Checklist

All checks are run in GitHub Actions. You'll be able to see the results of the checks at the bottom of the pull request page after it's been opened, and you can click on any of the specific checks listed to see the output of each step and debug failures.

  • [x ] Tests are implemented
  • [x ] All tests are passing
  • [x ] Style checks run (see documentation for more details)
  • [ x] Style checks are passing
  • [ x] Code comments from template removed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved date parsing for event handling, enhancing the robustness of date management.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated date extraction logic to ensure accurate parsing of date strings.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the ChiMetroPierExpositionSpider class located in city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py. A new import for dateutil.parser has been added, and the _parse_start method has been updated to improve date string extraction and parsing. The method now splits the date string on an asterisk and uses dateutil.parser.parse for more flexible date handling. The overall structure and logic of the spider's methods remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py Added import for dateutil.parser; updated _parse_start method for improved date parsing logic.

Poem

In the city where the pier does gleam,
A spider weaves its parsing dream.
With dates now flexibly caught,
Asterisks split the strings we sought.
Hopping through data, oh what a sight,
Parsing with ease, all day and night! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py (1)

Line range hint 73-81: Document the date format handling

The implementation looks good! Consider adding a docstring comment explaining the date format handling, especially for rescheduled dates marked with asterisks.

     def _parse_start(self, item, classification):
-        """Parse start datetime as a naive datetime object."""
+        """Parse start datetime as a naive datetime object.
+        
+        Handles various date formats including rescheduled dates marked with asterisks.
+        Sets time to 9:00 AM for Board meetings and 1:30 PM for Committee meetings.
+        """
         date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1]
         date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5993e2d and d0a0795.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py (2)

2-2: Verify python-dateutil dependency

Good choice using dateutil.parser for more flexible date parsing. However, we need to ensure this dependency is properly declared in the project's requirements.

✅ Verification successful

dateutil.parser dependency is properly declared

The dependency is correctly declared in both Pipfile and Pipfile.lock. Additionally, dateutil.parser is already widely used across multiple spiders in the codebase for date parsing, making it a well-established dependency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if python-dateutil is declared in requirements files
fd "requirements.*\.txt$" | xargs rg "python-dateutil|dateutil"

Length of output: 2035


76-77: Verify date parsing with various formats

Let's verify that the new date parsing logic handles all expected date formats, including rescheduled dates with apostrophes.

✅ Verification successful

Date parsing implementation is robust and well-tested

The verification shows that:

  • The date parsing is well-handled using dateutil.parser.parse() which is flexible and supports various date formats
  • The test file includes comprehensive test cases with actual dates (e.g., datetime(2018, 1, 23, 9))
  • The spider handles date parsing edge cases by:
    • Stripping whitespace and splitting on "*" character to handle rescheduled dates
    • Setting appropriate default times based on meeting classification (9:00 AM for Board, 1:30 PM for Committee)
  • The test suite verifies both regular and cancelled meeting dates
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for date patterns in the spider's test file
fd "test_chi_metro_pier_exposition.py" | xargs rg "test_response = \"\"\".*\n.*\n.*<td>" -A 5

# Check if there are any existing date parsing related issues
gh issue list --repo City-Bureau/city-scrapers --label "spider:chi_metro_pier_exposition" --json title,body --jq '.[] | select(.title | contains("date") or .body | contains("date"))'

Length of output: 465


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files and their content with proper multiline support
fd "test_chi_metro_pier_exposition.py" | xargs cat

# Also check the actual spider implementation for date parsing patterns
fd "chi_metro_pier_exposition.py" --type f --exclude "*test*" | xargs cat

Length of output: 6410

Comment on lines +76 to +77
date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1]
date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for date parsing

While using dateutil.parser improves date format handling, we should add error handling to gracefully handle unparseable dates.

-        date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1]
-        date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
+        date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first()
+        if not date_str:
+            raise ValueError("No date string found")
+        date_str = date_str.strip().split("*")[-1]
+        try:
+            date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
+        except (ValueError, TypeError) as e:
+            raise ValueError(f"Failed to parse date '{date_str}': {str(e)}")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1]
date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first()
if not date_str:
raise ValueError("No date string found")
date_str = date_str.strip().split("*")[-1]
try:
date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
except (ValueError, TypeError) as e:
raise ValueError(f"Failed to parse date '{date_str}': {str(e)}")

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant