-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed issues with chi_metro_pier_exposition spyder in parsing date #1134
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py (1)
Line range hint
73-81
: Document the date format handlingThe implementation looks good! Consider adding a docstring comment explaining the date format handling, especially for rescheduled dates marked with asterisks.
def _parse_start(self, item, classification): - """Parse start datetime as a naive datetime object.""" + """Parse start datetime as a naive datetime object. + + Handles various date formats including rescheduled dates marked with asterisks. + Sets time to 9:00 AM for Board meetings and 1:30 PM for Committee meetings. + """ date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1] date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
city_scrapers/spiders/chi_metro_pier_exposition.py (2)
2-2
: Verify python-dateutil dependency
Good choice using dateutil.parser
for more flexible date parsing. However, we need to ensure this dependency is properly declared in the project's requirements.
✅ Verification successful
dateutil.parser
dependency is properly declared
The dependency is correctly declared in both Pipfile
and Pipfile.lock
. Additionally, dateutil.parser
is already widely used across multiple spiders in the codebase for date parsing, making it a well-established dependency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if python-dateutil is declared in requirements files
fd "requirements.*\.txt$" | xargs rg "python-dateutil|dateutil"
Length of output: 2035
76-77
: Verify date parsing with various formats
Let's verify that the new date parsing logic handles all expected date formats, including rescheduled dates with apostrophes.
✅ Verification successful
Date parsing implementation is robust and well-tested
The verification shows that:
- The date parsing is well-handled using
dateutil.parser.parse()
which is flexible and supports various date formats - The test file includes comprehensive test cases with actual dates (e.g.,
datetime(2018, 1, 23, 9)
) - The spider handles date parsing edge cases by:
- Stripping whitespace and splitting on "*" character to handle rescheduled dates
- Setting appropriate default times based on meeting classification (9:00 AM for Board, 1:30 PM for Committee)
- The test suite verifies both regular and cancelled meeting dates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for date patterns in the spider's test file
fd "test_chi_metro_pier_exposition.py" | xargs rg "test_response = \"\"\".*\n.*\n.*<td>" -A 5
# Check if there are any existing date parsing related issues
gh issue list --repo City-Bureau/city-scrapers --label "spider:chi_metro_pier_exposition" --json title,body --jq '.[] | select(.title | contains("date") or .body | contains("date"))'
Length of output: 465
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files and their content with proper multiline support
fd "test_chi_metro_pier_exposition.py" | xargs cat
# Also check the actual spider implementation for date parsing patterns
fd "chi_metro_pier_exposition.py" --type f --exclude "*test*" | xargs cat
Length of output: 6410
date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1] | ||
date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for date parsing
While using dateutil.parser
improves date format handling, we should add error handling to gracefully handle unparseable dates.
- date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1]
- date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
+ date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first()
+ if not date_str:
+ raise ValueError("No date string found")
+ date_str = date_str.strip().split("*")[-1]
+ try:
+ date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str)
+ except (ValueError, TypeError) as e:
+ raise ValueError(f"Failed to parse date '{date_str}': {str(e)}")
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first().strip().split("*")[-1] | |
date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str) | |
date_str = item.css("td::text").extract_first() | |
if not date_str: | |
raise ValueError("No date string found") | |
date_str = date_str.strip().split("*")[-1] | |
try: | |
date_obj = dateutil.parser.parse(date_str) | |
except (ValueError, TypeError) as e: | |
raise ValueError(f"Failed to parse date '{date_str}': {str(e)}") |
Summary
Issue: #N/A
There's an issue with the chi_metro_pier_exposition spyder where it wasn't parsing the date correctly. It wasn't parsing a date with an apostrophe correctly where the apostrophes indicating the dates been rescheduled and wasn't parsing differing date formats.
Checklist
All checks are run in GitHub Actions. You'll be able to see the results of the checks at the bottom of the pull request page after it's been opened, and you can click on any of the specific checks listed to see the output of each step and debug failures.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes