Skip to content

tier1: recover orphaned doc fixes into vNext (CONTRIBUTING header + #235)#236

Merged
Chris-Wolfgang merged 4 commits into
vNextfrom
tier1/markdown-audit
Jun 19, 2026
Merged

tier1: recover orphaned doc fixes into vNext (CONTRIBUTING header + #235)#236
Chris-Wolfgang merged 4 commits into
vNextfrom
tier1/markdown-audit

Conversation

@Chris-Wolfgang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Recovers tier-1 work that was orphaned in tier1/markdown-audit after #234 merged an early snapshot to vNext.

When #234 (markdown audit) merged into vNext, two later commits on this branch never made it back:

  1. CONTRIBUTING.md — the ### The 7 Analyzers### The 8 Analyzers header fix (the item-8 body landed via tier1: Markdown audit — drop stale REPO-INSTRUCTIONS, fix analyzer list (#172) #234, but the header correction did not).
  2. tier1: fix XML-doc inaccuracies from code-review pass (#161) #235 code-review doc fixesLoaderBase / TransformerBase <example> referenced the non-existent MaxItemCount (→ MaximumItemCount), and SystemProgressTimer doc pointed at a non-existent ManualProgressTimer (→ resolvable IProgressTimer cref).

vNext currently still has the buggy MaxItemCount examples and the "7 Analyzers" header, so this needs to land before v0.13.1 ships. The branch already has vNext merged in, so this is conflict-free.

Net diff: CONTRIBUTING.md + 3 src XML-doc files. No code-behavior change.

Closes #161 · Part of: #154

Chris-Wolfgang and others added 4 commits June 19, 2026 07:49
…tch list

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- LoaderBase / TransformerBase: <example> code referenced 'MaxItemCount',
  which is not a member; the property is 'MaximumItemCount' (4 occurrences).
- SystemProgressTimer: <remarks> told users to return a 'ManualProgressTimer'
  from CreateProgressTimer, but no such type exists. Point at a custom
  IProgressTimer implementation instead (now a resolvable <see cref>).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tier1: fix XML-doc inaccuracies from code-review pass (#161)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant