-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix plugin css #5498
Fix plugin css #5498
Conversation
@DDMeaqua is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the CSS styling in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- app/components/plugin.module.scss (1 hunks)
- app/components/plugin.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/components/plugin.module.scss (2)
13-13
: LGTM! Verify visual impact.The reduction in
min-width
from 300px to 280px for code blocks within the plugin content looks good. This change likely addresses a layout issue and aligns with the PR's objective of fixing a CSS-related bug.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the layout, please verify:
- The code blocks are still wide enough to display their content properly.
- There's no unexpected text wrapping or overflow.
- The overall layout of the plugin component remains visually balanced.
Line range hint
1-38
: Overall assessment: Changes look good and align with PR objectives.The modifications in this file effectively address CSS-related issues for the plugin component. The changes improve layout and responsiveness, particularly for different screen sizes. The reduction in
min-width
for code blocks and the addition of the.plugin-schema
class with its responsive design contribute to a better user experience.While the changes are approved, consider implementing the suggested minor improvements to enhance code readability and maintainability. These suggestions include using SCSS nesting and CSS variables.
Remember to thoroughly test these changes across various screen sizes and devices to ensure the intended layout improvements are achieved without introducing new issues.
.plugin-schema { | ||
display: flex; | ||
justify-content: flex-end; | ||
flex-direction: row; | ||
|
||
input { | ||
margin-right: 20px; | ||
|
||
@media screen and (max-width: 600px) { | ||
margin-right: 0px; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
@media screen and (max-width: 600px) { | ||
flex-direction: column; | ||
gap: 5px; | ||
|
||
button { | ||
padding: 10px; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Consider minor improvements.
The new .plugin-schema
class effectively improves the layout and responsiveness of the plugin schema section. It addresses potential layout issues on different screen sizes, which aligns well with the PR's objective of fixing CSS-related bugs.
Consider the following minor improvements:
- Use SCSS nesting for better readability:
.plugin-schema {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
flex-direction: row;
input {
margin-right: 20px;
}
@media screen and (max-width: 600px) {
flex-direction: column;
gap: 5px;
input {
margin-right: 0;
}
button {
padding: 10px;
}
}
}
- Consider using CSS variables for consistent values:
:root {
--plugin-schema-gap: 5px;
--plugin-schema-input-margin: 20px;
--plugin-schema-button-padding: 10px;
--plugin-schema-breakpoint: 600px;
}
.plugin-schema {
// ... (use the variables in place of hardcoded values)
}
This approach improves maintainability and consistency across the stylesheet.
<div className={pluginStyles["plugin-schema"]}> | ||
<input | ||
type="text" | ||
style={{ minWidth: 200, marginRight: 20 }} | ||
style={{ minWidth: 200 }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Missing flexbox properties in .plugin-schema
class
The .plugin-schema
class in app/components/plugin.module.scss
does not include the required display: flex
and justify-content: flex-end
properties. This omission may affect the layout and alignment of elements within the component as intended.
Please update the .plugin-schema
class to include the following properties:
.plugin-schema {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
/* other existing styles */
}
Analysis chain
Improved styling approach, but verify CSS implementation
The change from inline styles to a class-based approach for the div
element and the simplification of the input
element's inline style are good improvements. This enhances code maintainability and separates styling concerns.
However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that the
pluginStyles["plugin-schema"]
class in the CSS file includes the necessary flexbox properties (display: flex
andjustify-content: flex-end
) to maintain the intended layout. - Check if the removal of
marginRight: 20
from theinput
element affects the layout. If needed, add appropriate margin or padding in the CSS file.
To confirm the CSS implementation, please run the following script:
This will help ensure that the styling is correctly implemented in the CSS file.
Verify .plugin-schema
class includes required flexbox properties
The .plugin-schema
class exists, but please ensure it includes the following properties to maintain the intended layout:
display: flex
justify-content: flex-end
Please run the following script to verify these properties:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the CSS implementation for the plugin-schema class
# Test: Check if the plugin-schema class exists and has the necessary properties
rg --type css 'plugin-schema' app/components/plugin.module.scss
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that .plugin-schema class includes 'display: flex' and 'justify-content: flex-end'
# Check for 'display: flex' within .plugin-schema
rg '\.plugin-schema\s*\{[^}]*display\s*:\s*flex' app/components/plugin.module.scss
# Check for 'justify-content: flex-end' within .plugin-schema
rg '\.plugin-schema\s*\{[^}]*justify-content\s*:\s*flex-end' app/components/plugin.module.scss
Length of output: 181
Your build has completed! |
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
εεε―Ήζ―οΌ
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.plugin-schema
for improved layout and styling of plugin components.Bug Fixes
Refactor
PluginPage
component to utilize class-based styling instead of inline styles for better maintainability.