Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix plugin css #5498

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Fix plugin css #5498

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024

Conversation

DDMeaqua
Copy link
Contributor

@DDMeaqua DDMeaqua commented Sep 23, 2024

πŸ’» ε˜ζ›΄η±»εž‹ | Change Type

  • feat
  • fix
  • refactor
  • perf
  • style
  • test
  • docs
  • ci
  • chore
  • build

πŸ”€ ε˜ζ›΄θ―΄ζ˜Ž | Description of Change

πŸ“ θ‘₯充俑息 | Additional Information

ε‰εŽε―Ήζ―”οΌš
image

QQ_1727072338848

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new CSS class .plugin-schema for improved layout and styling of plugin components.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted CSS properties for better responsiveness on smaller screens, enhancing user experience.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the PluginPage component to utilize class-based styling instead of inline styles for better maintainability.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 23, 2024

@DDMeaqua is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the CSS styling in the plugin.module.scss file and adjustments to the PluginPage component in the plugin.tsx file. The CSS updates include a new class for layout adjustments and responsive design, while the component refactor replaces inline styles with class-based styling for better maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/components/plugin.module.scss Modified min-width from 300px to 280px; added .plugin-schema class with flexbox layout and responsive styles.
app/components/plugin.tsx Replaced inline styles in PluginPage with class-based styles; simplified input styling.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: selector cssΒ #5402: This PR modifies CSS styling in the ui-lib.module.scss file, which is relevant to the changes made in the plugin.module.scss file of the main PR, as both involve CSS class adjustments.

Suggested reviewers

  • Dogtiti

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
Styles were changed in a bright new way.
Flexbox and margins, all neat and fine,
A plugin's look, now truly divine!
Hopping with joy, we celebrate this feat,
For every line of code makes our work complete! πŸ‡βœ¨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23f2b62 and 4a60512.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/components/plugin.module.scss (1 hunks)
  • app/components/plugin.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
app/components/plugin.module.scss (2)

13-13: LGTM! Verify visual impact.

The reduction in min-width from 300px to 280px for code blocks within the plugin content looks good. This change likely addresses a layout issue and aligns with the PR's objective of fixing a CSS-related bug.

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the layout, please verify:

  1. The code blocks are still wide enough to display their content properly.
  2. There's no unexpected text wrapping or overflow.
  3. The overall layout of the plugin component remains visually balanced.

Line range hint 1-38: Overall assessment: Changes look good and align with PR objectives.

The modifications in this file effectively address CSS-related issues for the plugin component. The changes improve layout and responsiveness, particularly for different screen sizes. The reduction in min-width for code blocks and the addition of the .plugin-schema class with its responsive design contribute to a better user experience.

While the changes are approved, consider implementing the suggested minor improvements to enhance code readability and maintainability. These suggestions include using SCSS nesting and CSS variables.

Remember to thoroughly test these changes across various screen sizes and devices to ensure the intended layout improvements are achieved without introducing new issues.

Comment on lines +17 to +38
.plugin-schema {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
flex-direction: row;

input {
margin-right: 20px;

@media screen and (max-width: 600px) {
margin-right: 0px;
}
}

@media screen and (max-width: 600px) {
flex-direction: column;
gap: 5px;

button {
padding: 10px;
}
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Consider minor improvements.

The new .plugin-schema class effectively improves the layout and responsiveness of the plugin schema section. It addresses potential layout issues on different screen sizes, which aligns well with the PR's objective of fixing CSS-related bugs.

Consider the following minor improvements:

  1. Use SCSS nesting for better readability:
.plugin-schema {
  display: flex;
  justify-content: flex-end;
  flex-direction: row;

  input {
    margin-right: 20px;
  }

  @media screen and (max-width: 600px) {
    flex-direction: column;
    gap: 5px;

    input {
      margin-right: 0;
    }

    button {
      padding: 10px;
    }
  }
}
  1. Consider using CSS variables for consistent values:
:root {
  --plugin-schema-gap: 5px;
  --plugin-schema-input-margin: 20px;
  --plugin-schema-button-padding: 10px;
  --plugin-schema-breakpoint: 600px;
}

.plugin-schema {
  // ... (use the variables in place of hardcoded values)
}

This approach improves maintainability and consistency across the stylesheet.

Comment on lines +348 to +351
<div className={pluginStyles["plugin-schema"]}>
<input
type="text"
style={{ minWidth: 200, marginRight: 20 }}
style={{ minWidth: 200 }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Missing flexbox properties in .plugin-schema class

The .plugin-schema class in app/components/plugin.module.scss does not include the required display: flex and justify-content: flex-end properties. This omission may affect the layout and alignment of elements within the component as intended.

Please update the .plugin-schema class to include the following properties:

.plugin-schema {
  display: flex;
  justify-content: flex-end;
  /* other existing styles */
}
Analysis chain

Improved styling approach, but verify CSS implementation

The change from inline styles to a class-based approach for the div element and the simplification of the input element's inline style are good improvements. This enhances code maintainability and separates styling concerns.

However, please ensure the following:

  1. Verify that the pluginStyles["plugin-schema"] class in the CSS file includes the necessary flexbox properties (display: flex and justify-content: flex-end) to maintain the intended layout.
  2. Check if the removal of marginRight: 20 from the input element affects the layout. If needed, add appropriate margin or padding in the CSS file.

To confirm the CSS implementation, please run the following script:

This will help ensure that the styling is correctly implemented in the CSS file.


Verify .plugin-schema class includes required flexbox properties

The .plugin-schema class exists, but please ensure it includes the following properties to maintain the intended layout:

  1. display: flex
  2. justify-content: flex-end

Please run the following script to verify these properties:

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the CSS implementation for the plugin-schema class

# Test: Check if the plugin-schema class exists and has the necessary properties
rg --type css 'plugin-schema' app/components/plugin.module.scss

Length of output: 80


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that .plugin-schema class includes 'display: flex' and 'justify-content: flex-end'

# Check for 'display: flex' within .plugin-schema
rg '\.plugin-schema\s*\{[^}]*display\s*:\s*flex' app/components/plugin.module.scss

# Check for 'justify-content: flex-end' within .plugin-schema
rg '\.plugin-schema\s*\{[^}]*justify-content\s*:\s*flex-end' app/components/plugin.module.scss

Length of output: 181

Copy link
Contributor

Your build has completed!

Preview deployment

@Dogtiti Dogtiti merged commit 46fc2a5 into ChatGPTNextWeb:main Sep 24, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2024
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants