fix(cli): identify terminal replay users - #2913
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 38 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughReplay capture now sends optional person identification data, normalizes PostHog endpoints, applies request timeouts, and continues snapshot processing when email resolution or identification fails. Tests cover the updated flows and endpoint handling. ChangesReplay capture flow
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1📝 Generate docstrings 💡
Comment |
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing Footnotes
|
e8544b2 to
eaf049c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 7 files
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Re-trigger cubic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@supabase/functions/_backend/utils/posthog.ts`:
- Around line 110-112: Handle malformed PostHog hosts without throwing by
updating getPostHogCaptureUrl and its callers: at posthog.ts lines 36-36 and
392-392, catch URL-resolution failures, log them, and return false to preserve
the tracking and group-identification contracts; add regression tests covering
malformed hosts through trackPosthogEvent and groupIdentifyPosthog. The affected
anchor at posthog.ts lines 110-112 requires either controlled failure from
getPostHogCaptureUrl or caller-side exception handling.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 3ca7d537-90ed-4006-be17-44d781c30453
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
cli/src/build/prescan/engine.tssupabase/functions/_backend/private/replay.tssupabase/functions/_backend/utils/posthog.tstests/admin-stats.test.tstests/posthog.unit.test.ts
🔗 Linked repositories identified
CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
Cap-go/capacitor-updater(manual)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- supabase/functions/_backend/private/replay.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 5 files (changes from recent commits).
Tip: Review your code locally with the cubic CLI to iterate faster.
Re-trigger cubic
|



Summary
Verification
bun lintbun lint:backendbun test:unit(194 files, 1,402 tests)bun run cli:checkSummary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Reliability