Skip to content

release 0.20.0 (ai-env-changed)#1576

Merged
wwwy3y3 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
release/oss/0.20.0
Apr 18, 2025
Merged

release 0.20.0 (ai-env-changed)#1576
wwwy3y3 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
release/oss/0.20.0

Conversation

@wwwy3y3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@wwwy3y3 wwwy3y3 commented Apr 18, 2025

release/oss/0.20.0

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated product version references from release candidate to stable release in environment and configuration files.
    • Improved formatting for consistency in internal mappings (no impact on functionality).

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This change updates the WREN_PRODUCT_VERSION from 0.20.0-rc.2 to 0.20.0 in both the docker/.env.example file and the wren-launcher/utils/docker.go file. The update ensures that references to the product version now point to the stable release rather than the release candidate. Additionally, minor formatting adjustments were made to the spacing in a map within the Go file for consistency. No logic, function signatures, or other environment variables were altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docker/.env.example Updated WREN_PRODUCT_VERSION from 0.20.0-rc.2 to 0.20.0.
wren-launcher/utils/docker.go Updated WREN_PRODUCT_VERSION constant and adjusted spacing in generationModelToModelName map.

Possibly related PRs

  • release 0.16.0 #1405: Also updates the WREN_PRODUCT_VERSION constant in wren-launcher/utils/docker.go from a release candidate to a stable version, modifying the same code element.

Suggested reviewers

  • wwwy3y3

Poem

A version hops from rc to gold,
In Docker files, the story's told.
Constants polished, spacing neat,
Stable numbers—what a treat!
Now Wren can soar, no longer shy,
With 0.20.0, let's reach the sky!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2229b27 and 071bb94.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docker/.env.example (1 hunks)
  • wren-launcher/utils/docker.go (2 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title release 0.20.0 release 0.20.0 (ai-env-changed) Apr 18, 2025
@wwwy3y3 wwwy3y3 merged commit 1d60aef into main Apr 18, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@wwwy3y3 wwwy3y3 deleted the release/oss/0.20.0 branch April 18, 2025 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants