Repository navigation
Conversation
数据库保留 indicator.remark，前端/导入模板/导出/详情全部隐藏。 权重列全局统一纯数字格式（去掉百分比混用）。
Codex Review Summary: ✅ CompletedThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 619ccd2ae2
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
| <span class="detail-mutation-after">{{ formatMutationValue(change?.after) }}</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <template v-for="(change, fieldKey) in item.changedFields" :key="fieldKey"> | ||
| <div v-if="fieldKey !== 'remark'" class="detail-mutation-row"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a pending batch contains multiple entities, pendingMutationApprovalItems prefixes each key as <entity> · remark, so this exact equality check misses it and still exposes the supposedly hidden remark values. A single-field remark mutation also leaves an empty “本次异动内容” section because the parent v-if counts the unfiltered keys. Filter based on the normalized field suffix before both the wrapper check and row rendering.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| style="margin-bottom: 16px" | ||
| > | ||
| 学院指标由战略发展部统一下发；本部门负责归口指标的审核进度鉴定与上报审批，并可查看历史数据。 | ||
| 学院指标审批由战略发展部统一组织，本部门仅可查看历史数据 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For functional-department logins, this now says the department can only view history, even though this page still loads the appraisal gate and supports its active appraisal/approval responsibilities. This directly reverts the immediately preceding copy fix and can cause responsible users to overlook work they are expected to perform; retain the wording that describes appraisal and report approval duties.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
方案 A：全端隐藏下发备注字段 + 权重列纯数字统一（用户拍板）
indicator.remark，前端/导入模板/导出/详情全部隐藏（12 文件 +54/-332）关联