fix: prioritize @ file search over slash command completion

[BingqingLyu]

TLDR

Fix @ file search not working after selecting a custom slash command on the same line.

Fixes QwenLM#2518

Dive Deeper

Root Cause

In useCommandCompletion, the completion mode detection checks for slash commands before checking for @ file references:

if (cursorRow === 0 && isSlashCommand(currentLine.trim())) {
  return { completionMode: CompletionMode.SLASH, ... };
}
// @ detection never reached when line starts with /

Since isSlashCommand() returns true for any line starting with / (excluding // and /*), typing @ after a completed slash command like /qc:create-issue @readme still matches the slash command check first, and the @ file search code is never executed.

Fix

Reorder the completion mode detection to check for @ file references before slash commands. When the cursor is positioned after an @ character (within the current word boundary), AT mode takes priority. If no @ is found, the slash command check runs as before.

This preserves all existing behaviors:

• /help → SLASH mode (no @ in text) ✓
• /model qwen3 → SLASH mode (no @ in text) ✓
• /qc:create-issue @readme → AT mode (@ found before cursor) ✓
• @file → AT mode (no change) ✓
• plain text → IDLE mode (no change) ✓

Testing Matrix

• All 15 existing + new tests pass (useCommandCompletion.test.ts)
• Added regression test: @ after slash command triggers AT completion
• Pre-commit hooks (prettier + eslint) pass

[BingqingLyu]

Conflict Group 1

This PR shares modified functions with 2 other PR(s): #74, #9.

These PRs should be reviewed as a batch — merging one may affect the others.

Function	File	Also modified by
useCommandCompletion	useCommandCompletion.tsx	#74, #9

graph LR
    PR62["PR #62"]
    FuseCommandCompletion_8197["useCommandCompletion<br>useCommandCompletion.tsx"]
    PR62 -->|modifies| FuseCommandCompletion_8197
    PR74["PR #74"]
    PR74 -->|modifies| FuseCommandCompletion_8197
    PR9["PR #9"]
    PR9 -->|modifies| FuseCommandCompletion_8197

Loading

---

Posted by codegraph-ai conflict detection.

[github-actions]

This pull request has had no activity for 60 days and is being marked as stale. It will be closed in another 30 days if no further activity occurs. To keep it open, push a new commit or leave a comment. Maintainers may apply pinned, status/blocked, status/on-hold, or status/ready-for-merge to exempt it from auto-close.