feat: add state loading component #2117
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
You are out of MentatBot reviews. Your usage will refresh November 18 at 08:00 AM. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@edisontim has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
client/src/ui/containers/BottomLeftContainer.tsx (2)
1-3: Consider enhancing component structure and type safety.The component implementation could be improved for better maintainability and type safety.
Consider applying these improvements:
+interface BottomLeftContainerProps { + children: React.ReactNode; +} + -const BottomLeftContainer = ({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) => { +const BottomLeftContainer: React.FC<BottomLeftContainerProps> = ({ children }) => { - return <div className="absolute bottom-0 left-0">{children}</div>; + return ( + <aside + className="absolute bottom-0 left-0" + role="complementary" + > + {children} + </aside> + ); };This refactor:
- Extracts props interface for better type documentation
- Uses semantic
asideelement instead ofdiv- Adds ARIA role for better accessibility
1-5: Consider adding CSS isolation.The component uses global CSS classes which could lead to styling conflicts.
Consider using CSS modules or styled-components for better CSS isolation:
// BottomLeftContainer.module.css .container { position: absolute; bottom: 0; left: 0; } // BottomLeftContainer.tsx import styles from './BottomLeftContainer.module.css'; // ... then use styles.container instead of direct classesclient/src/ui/modules/navigation/BottomLeftNavigation.tsx (1)
3-4: Add TypeScript types for better type safetyConsider adding TypeScript types to improve code maintainability and catch potential issues early:
-export const BottomLeftNavigation = () => { +export const BottomLeftNavigation: React.FC = () => { + const eventsLoadingState = useUIStore((state: { eventsLoadingState: boolean }) => state.eventsLoadingState);client/src/dojo/setup.ts (1)
1-1: Consider a more robust state management approachWhile using
useUIStore.getState()works, it creates tight coupling between the setup logic and UI state. Consider:
- Passing the state setter as a configuration parameter to make the setup function more flexible and testable
- Adding error handling in case the store isn't initialized
-export async function setup({ ...config }: DojoConfig) { +export async function setup({ + ...config, + onEventsLoadingStateChange?: (loading: boolean) => void +}: DojoConfig & { + onEventsLoadingStateChange?: (loading: boolean) => void +}) { const network = await setupNetwork(config); const components = createClientComponents(network); const systemCalls = createSystemCalls(network); - const setLoadingState = useUIStore.getState().setEventsLoadingState; + const setLoadingState = onEventsLoadingStateChange ?? useUIStore.getState()?.setEventsLoadingState;Also applies to: 18-19
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
client/src/dojo/setup.ts(2 hunks)client/src/hooks/store/useUIStore.tsx(2 hunks)client/src/ui/containers/BottomLeftContainer.tsx(1 hunks)client/src/ui/layouts/World.tsx(2 hunks)client/src/ui/modules/navigation/BottomLeftNavigation.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
client/src/ui/containers/BottomLeftContainer.tsx (1)
2-2: Verify parent container positioning.
The use of absolute positioning requires the parent container to have relative positioning to work as expected.
Let's verify the parent container's positioning:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the parent component's structure.
Let me check the complete structure of World.tsx to see how the container is rendered and its styling.
The absolute positioning is correctly implemented
The parent container #world has fixed positioning and spans the full viewport with w-screen h-screen, which creates a proper positioning context for the absolutely positioned BottomLeftContainer. The absolute positioning will work as expected in this setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the parent component (World.tsx) has proper positioning
# Expected: Should find relative/absolute/fixed positioning in the parent component
rg -A 5 "BottomLeftContainer" | rg -B 5 "relative|absolute|fixed"
Length of output: 529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the World.tsx component's structure and styling
rg -A 10 "function World|const World" client/src/ui/layouts/World.tsx
Length of output: 496
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of World.tsx to check the container's wrapper/parent
cat client/src/ui/layouts/World.tsx
Length of output: 6871
client/src/ui/modules/navigation/BottomLeftNavigation.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM!
Clean import statement using absolute path.
1-12: Verify component integration points
Let's verify the integration with the container and store setup.
✅ Verification successful
Component integration is properly implemented
The verification confirms:
- Component is correctly imported and used in World.tsx using lazy loading
- Properly wrapped in BottomLeftContainer in World.tsx
- UIStore interface includes eventsLoadingState with correct initialization
- Store usage in component matches the interface definition
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify component integration and store usage
# Check BottomLeftContainer implementation
echo "Checking BottomLeftContainer implementation:"
rg -l "BottomLeftContainer" --type tsx
# Verify store implementation
echo "\nVerifying store implementation:"
ast-grep --pattern 'interface UIStore {
$$$
eventsLoadingState: boolean
$$$
}'
# Check usage in World.tsx
echo "\nChecking World.tsx integration:"
rg -A 5 "BottomLeftNavigation" --type tsx
Length of output: 4364
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with correct file extensions and additional context
# Check BottomLeftContainer and Navigation usage
echo "Checking component usage:"
rg -l "BottomLeftNavigation" .
# Check World.tsx content specifically
echo "\nChecking World.tsx content:"
rg -A 10 "BottomLeftNavigation" .
# Check if BottomLeftContainer exists
echo "\nChecking BottomLeftContainer existence:"
rg -l "BottomLeftContainer" .
# Verify store initialization
echo "\nChecking store initialization and eventsLoadingState usage:"
rg "eventsLoadingState" .
Length of output: 4010
client/src/dojo/setup.ts (1)
21-21: Document and verify the timeout increase
The sync timeout has been doubled from 10,000 to 20,000ms. While this might solve timeout issues, it could mask underlying performance problems.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the search results to verify the timeout concern:
- The search shows several timeouts in the codebase:
- A 20,000ms timeout in
config/index.ts - Multiple UI-related timeouts in various components for animations and state updates
- No error logs or comments indicating timeout issues
- Let's search specifically for the sync-related code and any potential timeout issues:
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response since I have sufficient context about the sync timeout change:
Timeout increase appears justified for entity synchronization
The timeout increase from 10,000 to 20,000ms is used specifically for getSyncEntities from @dojoengine/state, which is a core initialization function. This matches a similar 20,000ms timeout in config/index.ts, suggesting a standardized timeout value for network operations. There are no error logs or comments indicating performance issues, implying this is a proactive adjustment for reliability rather than a reaction to problems.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for timeout-related issues in the codebase
# Look for patterns that might indicate performance problems
# Search for timeout-related comments or issues
rg -i "timeout|timed?.?out" --type ts
# Look for similar timeout configurations
rg "(?:\d{4,5}_000|[12]\d{4})" --type ts
# Search for performance-related comments
rg -i "(?:slow|performance|latency)" --type ts
Length of output: 21426
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sync-related code and timeout patterns
rg -A 5 "getSyncEntities" --type ts
# Look for any error handling or comments around sync timeouts
rg -i "sync.*timeout|timeout.*sync" --type ts
# Search for any sync-related issues or performance comments
rg -B 2 -A 2 "sync.*error|error.*sync" --type ts
Length of output: 1387
client/src/hooks/store/useUIStore.tsx (2)
61-62: LGTM! Interface additions follow consistent patterns
The new properties for events loading state management are well-structured and follow the existing patterns in the store interface.
122-123: Verify integration with sync events handling
The implementation looks good, but let's verify the integration points mentioned in the summary:
- Usage in
setup.tsfor sync events completion - Usage in
BottomLeftNavigationfor loading indicator
✅ Verification successful
Integration points for eventsLoadingState are correctly implemented
The verification confirms that:
setup.tscorrectly accesses the setter viagetState()for updating loading state during syncBottomLeftNavigationproperly subscribes to the state for displaying loading indicator
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of eventsLoadingState
# Check setup.ts usage
echo "Checking setup.ts integration..."
rg "setEventsLoadingState" "client/src/dojo/setup.ts"
# Check BottomLeftNavigation usage
echo "Checking BottomLeftNavigation integration..."
rg "eventsLoadingState" "client/src/ui/modules/navigation/BottomLeftNavigation.tsx"
Length of output: 488
client/src/ui/layouts/World.tsx (2)
46-49: LGTM: Component declarations follow established patterns
The lazy loading implementation for both components follows the codebase's established patterns and best practices for code splitting.
154-157: Verify loading state integration
The AI summary mentions that BottomLeftNavigation uses eventsLoadingState from useUIStore. Let's verify this integration:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the loading state integration
# Check if BottomLeftNavigation properly uses eventsLoadingState
echo "Checking BottomLeftNavigation for eventsLoadingState usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'const $state = useUIStore((state) => state.eventsLoadingState)' $(fd -t f "BottomLeftNavigation.tsx$")
# Verify if eventsLoadingState is properly defined in UIStore
echo "Checking UIStore for eventsLoadingState definition..."
rg "eventsLoadingState" $(fd -t f "useUIStore.tsx$")| return eventsLoadingState ? ( | ||
| <div className="flex flex-row mb-4 ml-4 items-center bg-hex bg-black/50 rounded-lg p-2"> | ||
| <img src="/images/eternum-logo_animated.png" className="invert w-10 h-10" /> | ||
| <div className="text-xs text-white/90 ml-2 animate-pulse">Game state is loading...</div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| ) : null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve accessibility and performance
Several improvements can be made to enhance the component:
- Add alt text to the image for screen readers
- Consider reducing animation impact on performance
- Externalize text for internationalization
- Ensure sufficient contrast ratio for text visibility
return eventsLoadingState ? (
<div className="flex flex-row mb-4 ml-4 items-center bg-hex bg-black/50 rounded-lg p-2">
- <img src="/images/eternum-logo_animated.png" className="invert w-10 h-10" />
- <div className="text-xs text-white/90 ml-2 animate-pulse">Game state is loading...</div>
+ <img
+ src="/images/eternum-logo_animated.png"
+ alt="Loading indicator"
+ className="invert w-10 h-10"
+ loading="lazy"
+ />
+ <div className="text-xs text-white ml-2 animate-pulse" role="status">
+ {t('loading.gameState')}
+ </div>
</div>
) : null;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const eventSync = getSyncEvents( | ||
| network.toriiClient, | ||
| network.contractComponents.events as any, | ||
| undefined, | ||
| [], | ||
| 20_000, | ||
| false, | ||
| () => setLoadingState(false), | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve event sync error handling and loading state management
Several concerns with the current implementation:
- Loading state is only set to false but never explicitly set to true
- Missing error handling could leave the UI stuck in a loading state
- The purpose of the
falseparameter is unclear and should be documented
Consider implementing this more robust approach:
+ // Set initial loading state
+ setLoadingState(true);
+
const eventSync = getSyncEvents(
network.toriiClient,
network.contractComponents.events as any,
undefined,
[],
20_000,
false, // Add comment explaining this parameter
- () => setLoadingState(false),
+ () => setLoadingState(false)
+ ).catch(error => {
+ console.error('Event sync failed:', error);
+ setLoadingState(false);
+ throw error;
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const eventSync = getSyncEvents( | |
| network.toriiClient, | |
| network.contractComponents.events as any, | |
| undefined, | |
| [], | |
| 20_000, | |
| false, | |
| () => setLoadingState(false), | |
| ); | |
| // Set initial loading state | |
| setLoadingState(true); | |
| const eventSync = getSyncEvents( | |
| network.toriiClient, | |
| network.contractComponents.events as any, | |
| undefined, | |
| [], | |
| 20_000, | |
| false, // Add comment explaining this parameter | |
| () => setLoadingState(false) | |
| ).catch(error => { | |
| console.error('Event sync failed:', error); | |
| setLoadingState(false); | |
| throw error; | |
| }); |
|
|
||
| <BottomLeftContainer> | ||
| <BottomLeftNavigation /> | ||
| </BottomLeftContainer> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Mobile handling is appropriate, but layout needs adjustment
The BottomLeftNavigation component already has appropriate mobile handling through its conditional rendering based on eventsLoadingState. However, there are two layout considerations:
- The absolute positioning (
absolute bottom-0 left-0) in BottomLeftContainer could conflict with other UI elements since it's placed at the exact corner. - The component includes proper mobile-friendly padding (
mb-4 ml-4) and styling, but the background might need z-index handling to prevent overlaps.
Recommendations:
- Add a z-index to the BottomLeftContainer to ensure proper layering
- Consider adding some base padding/margin to the container to prevent edge-touching on mobile devices
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify mobile device handling and layout positioning
The new bottom-left components are added without mobile-specific handling, unlike other containers in the layout (e.g., BottomRightContainer). Please verify:
- If these components should be hidden on mobile devices
- If the positioning conflicts with other mobile UI elements
Let's check for any mobile-specific handling in the new components:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for mobile-specific handling in the new components
# Check BottomLeftContainer for mobile handling
echo "Checking BottomLeftContainer for mobile handling..."
rg -A 5 "IS_MOBILE" $(fd -t f "BottomLeftContainer.tsx$")
# Check BottomLeftNavigation for mobile handling
echo "Checking BottomLeftNavigation for mobile handling..."
rg -A 5 "IS_MOBILE" $(fd -t f "BottomLeftNavigation.tsx$")
# Check for potential layout conflicts
echo "Checking for other components with 'bottom-left' positioning..."
rg -i "bottom.?left" $(fd -t f -e tsx -e css)
Length of output: 766
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for mobile-specific styling and layout handling
# Check BottomLeftContainer styling and mobile handling
echo "Checking BottomLeftContainer styling..."
fd -t f "BottomLeftContainer" -x cat {}
# Check BottomLeftNavigation styling and mobile handling
echo "Checking BottomLeftNavigation styling..."
fd -t f "BottomLeftNavigation.tsx$" -x cat {}
# Check for any mobile-specific utilities or constants
echo "Checking for mobile utilities usage..."
rg "IS_MOBILE|isMobile|mobile" client/src/ui/layouts/World.tsx
# Check for any z-index or positioning conflicts
echo "Checking for positioning styles..."
rg "position:|z-index:|bottom:|left:" client/src/ui/layouts/World.tsx
Length of output: 1454
Needs dojoengine/dojo.js#332 to be merged
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
BottomLeftContainercomponent for flexible content display.BottomLeftNavigationcomponent to provide navigation functionality.BottomLeftNavigationcomponent.Improvements
These updates aim to provide a smoother user experience and better visual feedback during event loading.