Skip to content

feat(models): sync together_ai model registry - #41775

Open
mateo-berri wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
litellm_together_registry_sync_2026-09-18
Open

mateo-berri wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
litellm_together_registry_sync_2026-09-18

Conversation

@mateo-berri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated daily sync of the together_ai entries in model_prices_and_context_window.json against GET https://api.together.ai/v1/models?serverless and https://docs.together.ai/docs/deprecations.md by scripts/sync_together_ai_models.py.

Added (0)

  • none

Updated (0)

  • none

Marked deprecated (0)

  • none

Returned to the catalog (2)

  • together_ai/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
  • together_ai/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Warnings needing a human call (24)

  • together_ai/BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2-1.5B-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-Turbo is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/arcee-ai/trinity-mini is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/baai/bge-base-en-v1.5 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-0528 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/google/gemma-4-31B-it has curated deprecation_date '2026-09-14' but the docs list '2026-09-15'; left unchanged
  • together_ai/intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct has curated deprecation_date '2026-09-14' but the docs list '2026-09-15'; left unchanged
  • together_ai/meta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/mistralai/Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-2512 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/moonshotai/Kimi-K2-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5-fp4 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/openai/gpt-oss-20b has curated deprecation_date '2026-09-14' but the docs list '2026-09-15'; left unchanged
  • together_ai/thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small has curated deprecation_date '2026-09-14' but the docs list '2026-09-15'; left unchanged
  • together_ai/togethercomputer/CodeLlama-34b-Instruct is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call
  • together_ai/zai-org/GLM-4.6 is absent from the serverless catalog with no removal date in the docs; needs a human deprecation call

Catalog model types outside the sync's token-pricing scope, skipped: audio (5), image (29), transcribe (4), video (34)

@CLAassistant

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

RetriggerConfidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge because the two models are currently listed as serverless and no longer appear in the deprecation source

Summary

Synchronizes the Together AI model registry by returning two currently available DeepSeek models to the active catalog

  • Removes the former deprecation dates from DeepSeek V4 Flash and V4 Pro
  • Keeps the primary and backup model registries synchronized
  • Includes unrelated but behavior-preserving JSON serialization normalization

Reviews (1) · Last reviewed commit: "feat(models): sync together_ai model reg..."

@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 31 untouched benchmarks


Comparing litellm_together_registry_sync_2026-09-18 (dccc7e4) with main (c256c3c)

Open in CodSpeed

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@mateo-berri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@litellm-stampbot

@litellm-stampbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

litellm-stampbot: risk low

Approved at dccc7e4.

Rules (stampbot/risk_rules.yml):

  • low: no rule flagged it

Judge (gpt-6-luna): low, scoped behavior change, one provider or page, simple diff

  • tier: low (confidence 0.96)
  • change_kind: scoped_behavior_change (confidence 0.26)
  • blast_radius: one_provider_or_page (confidence 0.88)
  • complexity: simple (confidence 1.00)

Pushes do not re-run this check. Comment @litellm-stampbot again to re-check the new head.

@litellm-stampbot litellm-stampbot Bot added the risk:low Small, isolated, low-risk change label Oct 14, 2026

@litellm-stampbot litellm-stampbot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Low risk by rule and by judgement at dccc7e4

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

risk:low Small, isolated, low-risk change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants