feat(model_prices): add databricks/databricks-glm-5-3-flash - #38583
feat(model_prices): add databricks/databricks-glm-5-3-flash#38583devin-ai-integration[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository. ⚙️ Control Options:
|
|
|
|
Out of scope — #38583 has no |
Greptile SummaryAdds the Databricks GLM 5.3 Flash model to both model metadata registries so it resolves with documented context limits and capabilities.
Confidence Score: 5/5The PR appears safe to merge, with both model registries synchronized and no actionable defects identified. The added metadata conforms to the catalog schema, follows the existing Databricks model-entry structure, and intentionally excludes unavailable pricing data.
|
| Filename | Overview |
|---|---|
| model_prices_and_context_window.json | Adds schema-conforming metadata for the new Databricks model without an identified correctness issue. |
| litellm/model_prices_and_context_window_backup.json | Keeps the packaged backup registry synchronized with the primary model catalog. |
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "feat(model_prices): add databricks/datab..." | Re-trigger Greptile
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
|
Superseded by the rolling registry PR #38560, which absorbs this entry field-for-field (re-verified against the Databricks supported-models docs). Closing to keep a single open registry PR. |
TLDR
Problem this solves:
databricks-glm-5-3-flash), missing from the model registryHow it solves it:
databricks/databricks-glm-5-3-flashto the cost map and backup copyDatabricks has not published pay-per-token DBU rates for this model yet (it is absent from the foundation-model-serving pricing page as of 2026-08-27, verified live in a browser), so cost fields are intentionally omitted; a follow-up can add them once the rates appear. Capabilities and context length come from the Databricks supported models docs
User Flow
Before: a proxy admin cannot onboard the new Databricks GLM 5.3 Flash endpoint cleanly
databricks/databricks-glm-5-3-flashto their config and restart the proxyAfter: the model resolves from the registry with its real limits and capabilities
databricks/databricks-glm-5-3-flashto their config and restart the proxyRelevant issues
Model add requested by the team in Slack
Linear ticket
Pre-Submission checklist
Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR
uv run pytest tests/test_litellm/<your_test_file>.py -v@greptileaito re-request a review after pushing changes)Delays in PR merge?
If you're seeing a delay in your PR being merged, ping the LiteLLM Team on Slack (#pr-review).
Screenshots / Proof of Fix
After (7ec946c)
Model resolves on a live proxy
Proxy started with the model configured, then:
Before this change the same lookup raises: model not found in model_prices_and_context_window.json
Link to Devin session: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/b7c5f03e7a9945bca7944fef42d291bf
Open in Devin Desktop: https://app.devin.ai/desktop/session/b7c5f03e7a9945bca7944fef42d291bf?variant=devin