Skip to content

chore(ci): promote internal staging to main - #36304

Merged
yuneng-berri merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
litellm_internal_staging
Aug 8, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): promote internal staging to main#36304
yuneng-berri merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
litellm_internal_staging

Conversation

@yuneng-berri

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

TLDR

Problem this solves:

  • ...

How it solves it:

  • ...

User Flow

Relevant issues

Linear ticket

Pre-Submission checklist

Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR

  • I have added meaningful tests
  • My PR passes all CI/CD checks (e.g., lint, format, unit tests)
  • My PR's scope is as isolated as possible; it only solves 1 specific problem
  • I have received a Greptile Confidence Score of at least 4/5 before requesting a maintainer review (Greptile reviews automatically once the PR is opened; only comment @greptileai to re-request a review after pushing changes)

Delays in PR merge?

If you're seeing a delay in your PR being merged, ping the LiteLLM Team on Slack (#pr-review).

Screenshots / Proof of Fix

Type

🆕 New Feature
🐛 Bug Fix
🧹 Refactoring
📖 Documentation
🚄 Infrastructure
✅ Test

Changes

QA runbook

Final Attestation

  • The tests check the right things, including the edge cases, and regressions in the respective real-world customer use-cases are not possible after this PR

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Too many files changed for review (710 files, 100 file limit).

@yuneng-berri
yuneng-berri merged commit 6a919ae into main Aug 8, 2026
102 of 103 checks passed
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 31 untouched benchmarks


Comparing litellm_internal_staging (27d2fa8) with main (10798ca)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (27d2fa8) during the generation of this report, so 10798ca was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants