-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11k
fix(realtime): post-tool-call function_response id omission #30446
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
mateo-berri
merged 8 commits into
litellm_internal_staging
from
litellm_fix_vertex_realtime_query_params
Jun 23, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b546918
fix(realtime): stop appending client query params to Vertex Live WSS URL
Sameerlite 7b8c4d8
fix(vertex): omit function_response id in Vertex Live tool responses
Sameerlite 6e7614f
test(vertex realtime): exercise async_realtime so the query-param reg…
mateo-berri 9901f1d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/litellm_internal_staging' into l…
mateo-berri e855fed
style(gemini realtime): use builtin dict generic for function_respons…
mateo-berri 7d9f337
test(interactions): reconcile Interaction spec tripwire after Google …
mateo-berri 07d0c71
Merge branch 'litellm_internal_staging' into litellm_fix_vertex_realt…
Sameerlite d902933
fix(typing): bring reportReturnType back under the basedpyright budget
mateo-berri File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kind of weird to me to have a function return a bool and to override that in the child class. I would've thought a class attribute was better. But I read online that this is an accepted pattern so it's fine lgtm